MINNEAPOLIS, MN — Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison is under intense scrutiny as he responds to criticism over his office’s management of a significant housing fraud case. The scandal involves Nolosha Development, a company that promised members of the Somali-American community new homes but failed to follow through on its commitments.
Ellison has maintained a firm stance that he has no regrets about how the case was handled. In a recent interview, he stated unequivocally, “No,” when asked if he would do anything differently regarding the Nolosha Development fraud. This response sparked a wave of outrage on social media, with some critics suggesting that Ellison should resign alongside Governor Tim Walz. This reflects a growing discontent about accountability in state leadership.
The public’s concerns are amplified by the broader context of multiple fraud cases linked to Somali-run organizations in Minnesota. The Nolosha case, where over 200 families invested their life savings, highlights serious shortcomings in consumer protection and the urgency for state officials to act decisively against scams, especially when cultural sensitivities arise.
200+ Families Targeted
Nolosha Development, led by Abdiwali Abdullahi, promised a thriving neighborhood for Somali-Americans in Lakeville, with amenities like halal markets and mosques. Families were lured into paying $25,000 upfront for homes that never materialized. Over time, these families found that Nolosha did not own the land or possess necessary permits to build. The once-promised homeownership turned into silence and unfulfilled promises, leading frustrated customers to demand refunds, which were reportedly denied.
In October 2024, a Dakota County judge ruled against Nolosha after the company failed to respond to legal demands. The court recognized Ellison’s claims that Nolosha deceived vulnerable families with empty promises. However, the damage was extensive, with financial losses still being calculated. Families have been left in a vulnerable position, waiting for justice that came too late.
Broader Pattern of Somali-Linked Fraud?
The Nolosha scandal is part of a troubling trend of fraud cases involving the Somali-American community in Minnesota. Earlier investigations, notably the Feeding Our Future scandal, revealed substantial misappropriation of federal funds meant for child nutrition programs. With these issues surfacing, many Republican leaders are calling for a reassessment of how Ellison and Governor Walz address and prosecute fraud in sensitive communities. They argue that the state must uphold consistent standards of justice, regardless of political or cultural considerations.
“It’s not just about one bad actor,” a GOP source pointed out. This sentiment emphasizes the need for vigilance and accountability, highlighting a perceived failure by officials to effectively investigate and prosecute these serious matters.
Lack of Accountability Draws Fire
Criticism of Ellison’s approach is mounting, especially regarding the delayed response time. Complaints about Nolosha began surfacing as early as 2023, yet legal action did not commence until much later, allowing the company to continue its operations while complaints piled up. Observers have noted that if the circumstances were reversed—if a white developer targeted Somali families—swift action would likely have been taken. This perception of uneven application of justice fuels frustration within the community.
Ellison maintains that his office acted appropriately, stating, “After numerous complaints… we discovered a pattern of fraudulent behavior.” However, this assurance rings hollow for many affected families and residents who believe the response was inadequate.
GOP Demands for Resignations and Reform
Demands for Ellison and Walz to resign stem from a broader dissatisfaction among conservatives in Minnesota, who feel that state leadership is failing to provide transparent and effective oversight. Some GOP lawmakers are advocating for a federal review to ensure accountability in organizations tied to the Somali-American community. The situation has escalated to the point where concerns about potential links to international terrorism have emerged, although such claims have yet to be substantiated legally.
“The sprawling fraud is troubling enough for Minnesota taxpayers,” GOP Floor Leader Harry Niska stated, addressing the alarming potential for funds to flow to dangerous entities. This adds an unsettling layer to an already disturbing narrative about fraud in the community.
While community advocates defend the majority of Somali-Americans as law-abiding individuals, the series of fraud allegations undermines the public’s trust. Ellison’s refusal to revisit the case handling is deepening the divide between the Somali community and state officials.
What Comes Next
The court’s default judgment against Nolosha Development may lead to eventual compensation for troubled families, yet it does not erase the pain of lost savings and broken trust. The call for a court receiver to manage remaining assets suggests that some form of restitution may occur, but many are left questioning the overall effectiveness of state oversight in such cases.
For Ellison, this situation poses a dual risk: the potential legal ramifications of the case combined with significant political fallout. Community members draw attention to the perceived lack of urgency from officials, fueling doubts about their commitment to justice for those impacted. In a landscape where accountability is paramount, Ellison’s decisive response—or lack thereof—will continue to shape opinions about his leadership. As many Minnesotans hold fast to principles of law and order, his single-word answer—”No”—underscores a broader narrative of perceived indifference to serious grievances.
"*" indicates required fields
