Federal immigration enforcement actions have sharply escalated in Minnesota, targeting Somali-owned businesses and sparking significant political tensions. The operation, known as “Operation Metro Surge,” began in early December 2025. It has involved unannounced visits to restaurants and public spaces where Somali residents frequently gather. This uptick in activity by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has raised questions about its impact on both local communities and wider immigration policy.
The situation gained urgency following controversial remarks from former President Donald Trump, who disparaged Somali immigrants, using derogatory terms. With statements like these shaping public perception, support for ICE’s actions appears polarized, with many conservatives praising the crackdown as overdue enforcement. A tweet highlighting the enforcement incident in Somali restaurants struck a chord with like-minded voters. Responses like, “I voted for this 1,000X! KEEP GOING!”, reflect the supporters’ enthusiasm for strong immigration enforcement.
ICE asserts that its operations focus strictly on individuals with outstanding deportation orders or criminal backgrounds, not on ethnicity. They claim that the targeted raids are a lawful response aimed at those violating immigration laws. However, scrutiny from local leaders complicates this narrative. City Councilman Jamal Osman has witnessed disturbing conditions during these operations, stating, “I just don’t know what they accomplished today other than the chaos.” His observations underline the discord between federal intentions and their real-world implications.
During the raids, which reportedly involved plainclothes officers and unmarked vehicles, ICE agents approached people in public places and eateries, asking for identification. There were instances where individuals were briefly detained and released after verifying their immigration status. For example, a Somali college student at Augsburg University was reported detained but later released upon presenting his passport. This raises serious concerns about the misrepresentation of authority and the legal basis of such actions.
Local authorities have responded with clear resistance, emphasizing that ICE’s actions create fear rather than enhance public safety. Governor Tim Walz articulated these concerns in a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, stating that such tactics instill fear in the community. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey echoed this sentiment, accusing ICE of leveraging the situation for political gain rather than focused law enforcement. His assertion that the operation was about “stoking xenophobia” illustrates the distress these federal actions have caused among city officials.
The ramifications extend beyond immediate arrests. Community members report feeling unsafe and anxious about their daily lives. Families are reportedly canceling appointments and keeping children home from school due to fear of detention. Immigration attorney Amiin Harun noted that even lawful residents are hesitant to engage with the outside world, which highlights the chilling effect of these enforcement actions. According to Harun, “This is not law enforcement. This is intimidation.”
Amid this turmoil lies an underlying case of financial fraud related to pandemic relief funds, which may have fueled the federal focus on Somali communities. Reports cite roughly $300 million in fraudulent claims associated with aid programs. While this issue rightly demands attention, the approach taken by ICE in response raises ethical and legal concerns regarding how communities are policed and treated.
Former President Trump’s dehumanizing language directed at Somali citizens has also drawn sharp criticism from community leaders. Somali-American Republican Salman Fiqy points out that such rhetoric from a prominent political figure creates a toxic environment while setting a dangerous precedent. “It’s very unpresidential to dehumanize a whole entire community,” he stated, amplifying the plea for recognition and dignity for all individuals, regardless of their background.
In light of these developments, local officials highlight failures in collaboration between ICE and city law enforcement. Reports indicate that ICE has ignored established city policies meant to limit federal immigration activities in public spaces, leading to frustrated responses from city leaders. The city’s decision to restrict access to city-owned facilities has not fully curbed ICE activities, as eyewitnesses attest to ongoing stops occurring near these restricted areas.
Legal experts have also raised alarms about insufficient resources to address the legal needs that arise from these immigration raids. Attorney David Wilson noted a shortage of available lawyers to advocate for individuals wrongfully detained. Many detainees do not receive timely counsel, complicating their ability to navigate legal challenges. This situation further emphasizes the stress placed on local resources as agencies grapple with a surge in immigration enforcement.
As ICE continues with operations that many see as overreaching, discussions around Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somali nationals resurface. Previous efforts to end TPS under the Trump administration have left numerous individuals in dangerous limbo, with fluctuating political dialogues leaving uncertainty about their future in the U.S.
Ultimately, the lives of Somali residents are being reshaped by these federal actions. Daily habits are changing as families adapt to a climate of fear. CAIR-Minnesota director Jaylani Hussein encapsulated this anxiety, stating, “People are not just scared of being deported; they’re scared of being disappeared.” The current debate is likely not to abate soon, as the implications of these enforcement actions and the national immigration strategy continue to evolve in Minnesota’s politically charged atmosphere.
"*" indicates required fields
