Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal stands accused of a horrific crime that underscores the complexities of immigration and public safety. The formal charges relate to the shooting of National Guardsmen Andrew Wolfe and Sarah Beckstrom outside a Washington, D.C., metro stop. Beckstrom was reportedly killed in the incident, while Wolfe continues to fight for recovery. The Department of Justice seems poised to seek the death penalty, indicating the gravity of the situation.
In the aftermath, a fierce debate has emerged, casting blame not just on Lakanwal but also on President Donald Trump and his deployment of the National Guard. Critics, particularly from the left, have attempted to frame the deployment as a calculated political move that unnecessarily placed Guardsmen in harm’s way. The San Francisco Chronicle echoed this sentiment by claiming that warnings foresaw the potential for inflamed tensions due to Guard deployments. Jane Mayer from The New Yorker joined the fray on social media, calling it a “political show” and suggesting that the Guardsmen should never have been put in such a position.
However, the narrative that the presence of the National Guard escalates violence simply does not hold up under scrutiny. In truth, the deployment has coincided with a drop in crime rates in a city that has long battled violence. Before the deployment, the homicide rate in D.C. was still troublingly high—70% greater than the low recorded in 2014. Statistics reveal that in 2024, D.C.’s homicide rate even outstripped cities like Atlanta and Chicago. The reality paints a more severe picture: 95% of murder victims and suspects in D.C. are Black, and a staggering 92% are men.
Despite attempts to dismiss the effectiveness of the National Guard’s presence, data indicates a significant reduction in shootings since their arrival. Research by crime analyst Jeff Asher has confirmed this decline, aligning with previous analyses showing the positive impact of armed deployments on crime rates in cities like Memphis. Detractors may prefer to view the Guardsmen as mere symbols, but the evidence suggests that their very presence acts as a deterrent against crime. It is worth noting that any genuine concern for D.C.’s vulnerable populations should acknowledge and applaud these results.
As for Lakanwal’s motivations, the emerging picture presents him more as a troubled individual than a product of the Guard’s presence. He was let into the U.S. under the Biden administration’s Operation Allies Welcome after the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. Lakanwal previously worked alongside the CIA but struggled to acclimate to life in America. Reports highlight his documented struggles with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and his inability to maintain a job, leading to years of social isolation.
While Lakanwal’s actions must be viewed as his own responsibility, they also raise questions about the broader vetting process for immigrants during a turbulent period for the United States. His case illustrates the potential failures in a hasty immigration system that allowed someone with a troubled history into the country. As Lakanwal is among the many immigrants admitted in recent years, his situation serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of unregulated entry into the nation.
The necessity of the National Guard’s deployment is highlighted by Lakanwal’s case. He exemplifies precisely the type of individual the Guardsmen were sent to deter amid a backdrop of unchecked criminal behavior. Far from being a façade, the Guard’s presence represents a crucial step in addressing a crime-ridden city and ensuring the safety of both residents and officers. Downplaying this reality undermines the sacrifices made by individuals like Staff Sgt. Wolfe and Spc. Beckstrom, who put their lives on the line to keep the peace.
In conclusion, Rahmanullah Lakanwal’s actions serve as a clarion call for a deeper examination of both the immigration system and public safety policies. The tragic loss of life impacts more than just two Guardsmen; it reverberates throughout a community already grappling with violence. The narrative of blame should focus not merely on political figures but also on the myriad factors leading to such devastating outcomes. The National Guard’s role cannot be dismissed, as their presence is essential for both immediate and long-term solutions in maintaining safety within the District.
"*" indicates required fields
