In a striking moment at the DealBook Summit, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confronted The New York Times, highlighting what he termed a significant oversight regarding President Joe Biden’s fitness for office.
Bessent’s remarks, made in front of influential attendees, quickly gained traction online. He stated, “I actually don’t read the New York Times anymore. Occasionally people send me articles, and there’s just this fever swamp.” This blunt dismissal underscores a broader conversation about media credibility, especially as it pertains to critical issues that impact national governance.
His assertion that the Times neglected to address “one of the greatest scandals of all time”—the alleged cover-up regarding Biden’s mental acuity—resonated deeply. During a time when public trust in major news outlets is waning, this accusation may only amplify concerns about journalistic integrity. A Gallup poll indicates that 59% of Americans believe Biden’s age seriously limits his ability to serve, making Bessent’s critique all the more timely.
Media Accountability Under Fire
Bessent’s allegations of negligence against the media are not new but take on fresh significance in the modern landscape. He noted that silence from the media “is complicity,” suggesting an unspoken agreement to ignore pressing issues related to the president’s cognitive fitness. Reports of brief public appearances and seemingly scripted engagements only add fuel to the fire for critics who demand greater transparency.
Former White House physician Ronny Jackson has consistently called for cognitive testing, yet a lack of public data on Biden’s health continues to frustrate many. These discussions are often sidelined by other narratives, skewing public perception and complicating political accountability.
Policy Implications
Bessent’s rebuke of the Times also highlights the broader context of fiscal policy amidst these media dynamics. Ensuring that the American public is accurately informed about key issues such as trade deals and economic strategies is crucial for the credibility of government actions. With elements of the Treasury’s policies showing promise—such as favorable bond market returns—Bessent fears these vital conversations are being overshadowed by sensationalism in the media.
His remark, “If you can’t report on whether the President of the United States is mentally fit to govern, what are you doing?” strikes at the heart of this issue. It raises questions about the role of journalism in fostering an informed electorate capable of holding leaders accountable.
Trust Eroding
The decline in trust toward traditional media sources is not merely anecdotal. A Reuters Institute survey identified a stark drop in the percentage of U.S. adults trusting media outlets, from 40% five years ago to just 26% today. This trend reflects a significant shift in public engagement with news. Many are seeking alternatives, finding their information in platforms that may not adhere to the same journalistic standards.
Bessent’s statements reveal a growing frustration not only with the Times but a concern that this trend threatens the very fabric of democratic dialogue. The stability of the Times financially may not be enough to shield its reputation from backlash over journalistic practices. His comments serve both as a personal indictment and a reflection of a wider sentiment brewing among Americans disillusioned with mainstream media.
Looking Ahead
The implications of Bessent’s criticism could reverberate through the political landscape as upcoming discussions and hearings on Biden’s health become increasingly relevant. With heightened scrutiny likely intensifying, the media may find itself at a crossroads—either adjust its focus to restore credibility or face further deterioration in public trust.
Bessent’s conclusion encapsulates this tension: “I’m not here to pick fights with journalists. I’m here to pick fights with falsehoods.” His stance calls for clarity and accountability in discourse about leadership and governance, suggesting that without a commitment to truth, the very foundation of American democracy may be at risk.
"*" indicates required fields
