The potential for significant changes to the Supreme Court looms with the 2026 elections, according to former President Donald Trump. He expressed his concerns on Truth Social, stating, “The Democrats’ number one policy push is the complete and total OBLITERATION of our great United States Supreme Court.” Trump believes that if Democrats win, they would swiftly act to dismantle established norms by eliminating the filibuster. This maneuver could facilitate radical alterations to the Court’s structure in a matter of days.
Trump’s alarm centers on the prospect of court-packing, where Democrats may consider expanding the number of justices from nine to twenty-one. He warned that this shift would have severe consequences for the country but expressed confidence that Republicans would resist such actions. “Fear not, however, Republicans will not let it,” he asserted, suggesting that his party remains committed to preserving the integrity of the judiciary.
The discussion around the Supreme Court’s composition is not new. In 2021, amid Democratic control of Congress and the White House, a proposal to expand the court was put forth. Many Democrats have voiced frustration over what they see as an unbalanced court after Trump appointed Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, creating a solid conservative majority alongside Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts has been vocal in his advocacy for court-packing, arguing that the Supreme Court is “broken” and that its legitimacy is under scrutiny. He claimed that the rights of various communities are threatened by the current makeup of the Court. Such rhetoric is echoed by others who argue that failing to expand the court soon would endanger democracy itself.
Trump’s fears about potential court-packing find allies among Republican lawmakers. Senator Ted Cruz recently introduced a constitutional amendment to maintain the Court’s size at nine justices. Cruz highlighted the long-standing Democratic goal of using the Court to achieve policy objectives unattainable through elections. He described court-packing as an “assault on the design of our Constitution,” characterizing it as a partisan effort that could undermine the judiciary’s role as guardian of the law.
The stakes are high as the 2026 elections approach. With Trump’s endorsement underscoring these fears, Republicans appear resolute in their determination to safeguard the Supreme Court from what they perceive as a radical realignment by Democrats. Their opposition to court-packing is framing itself not only as a defense of the judiciary but also as a commitment to traditional constitutional values.
"*" indicates required fields
