The recent survey from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression reveals alarming trends in campus speech culture, particularly in the wake of a tragic event. Polling 2,028 college students from October 3 to October 31, it uncovers that nearly half of students nationwide believe that words can constitute violence. This finding raises questions about the state of free expression on American campuses today.
Specifically, the poll shows that 48 percent of students agree either “completely” or “mostly” with the assertion that “words can be violence.” At Utah Valley University, where Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was murdered, the figure is slightly lower at 46 percent. This suggests that students are increasingly viewing language through a lens of potential harm, reflecting a concerning shift in how free speech is perceived.
Political violence, the survey indicates, is not seen as confined to one ideology. Students believe it is a bipartisan issue. The Foundation shared insights on how political speech is becoming synonymous with violence: “Students were also more likely than the general public to say political violence is a bipartisan problem.” This viewpoint highlights a shared sense of insecurity that transcends partisan lines but emphasizes that the fear of violence is palpable among students.
Tyler Robinson, the alleged shooter in the Kirk case, serves as a real-world manifestation of this mentality. His expressed views prior to the incident underscore the potential consequences of conflating speech with violence. Students at Utah Valley voiced that political violence is a significant concern, particularly among progressives. Yet notably, a larger segment of students, regardless of their political stance, categorized political violence as a concern among conservatives and across all political groups.
The ramifications of Kirk’s assassination extend beyond political discourse; they have fostered an environment of self-censorship. The poll reveals a notable increase in students at Utah Valley who report holding back their opinions in classrooms—from 24 percent to 34 percent since Kirk’s death. This statistic illustrates a chilling effect on open expression, driven by fear rather than institutional policy. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression states, “Students say they are pulling back, are speaking less, and are less comfortable attending events.”
These findings paint a stark picture of a campus climate where fear stifles discussion and inquiry. The Foundation warns that this chilling effect is felt not only at Utah Valley University but across campuses nationwide. The organization emphasizes that to foster an environment conducive to academic freedom and open inquiry, leaders must confront this pervasive fear. They must actively work to cultivate a culture that supports expression, even amid controversy.
The implications of this survey are profound. It serves as a call to reflect on the nature of free speech in America. If free speech is only exercised in comfortable circumstances, can it truly be deemed free? The endurance of speech amid adversity must be championed as a hallmark of democracy. As expressed by the Foundation, the situation calls for resilience and commitment to preserving open dialogue, especially in uncertain times.
"*" indicates required fields
