The ongoing conflict between Thailand and Cambodia has reached a disturbing intensity, reminiscent of previous cycles of violence driven by unresolved historical disputes. A ceasefire brokered in July, involving President Trump and Malaysian authorities, has now collapsed, leading to renewed military engagement between the two nations. Both sides blame each other for reigniting the hostilities.
The conflict is deeply rooted in colonial history. Disputed temple sites like Preah Vihear have long been flashpoints, with an International Court of Justice verdict from 1962 affirming Cambodia’s sovereignty over the temple but leaving surrounding territories undefined. Such ambiguities have fueled tensions, worsened when Cambodia sought UNESCO recognition for Preah Vihear in 2008, triggering nationalist sentiments and subsequent clashes.
The latest skirmishes began on May 28, 2025, with the killing of a Cambodian soldier, escalating rapidly after a Thai soldier suffered serious injury from a landmine. Cambodia retaliated with rocket strikes into Thai territory, prompting Thailand to respond with airstrikes, marking the first use of aerial power in combat since previous border conflicts. The aftermath was devastating: 48 lives lost and around 300,000 civilians displaced.
Attempts at a ceasefire were made, with mediation from Malaysia and pressure from President Trump. This truce, formalized in October, was short-lived. By December, fighting had erupted once again, leading to multiple fatalities and thousands of civilians forced from their homes. Thailand’s military operations have included significant air assaults deep into Cambodian territory, illustrating an escalation of force. Reports indicate civilian casualties on both sides, raising alarms over humanitarian implications amidst the fighting.
The conflict has not only military implications but has also destabilized domestic politics in both countries. In Thailand, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was ousted following a leaked conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, which escalated nationalist anger and impacted her political standing. Meanwhile, Hun Sen has skillfully navigated the political landscape, continuing to influence Cambodia’s governance while making way for his son, Hun Manet.
Militarily, Thailand exhibits substantial advantages. The country has deployed F-16 fighters, advanced artillery, and modern defense systems, including the Israeli Barak MX. In contrast, Cambodia relies on aging Soviet-era equipment and Chinese-supplied rocket systems, reflecting a disparity in military capabilities.
The fallout from this conflict extends beyond the battlefield, unraveling approximately $4.7 billion in annual trade and complicating energy developments in the Gulf of Thailand. Despite calls for intervention, ASEAN has not effectively mediated, adhering to its guiding principle of non-interference even when member states are embroiled in conflict.
President Trump has urged both nations to respect the ceasefire he helped establish. However, as diplomatic initiatives falter, the situation remains precarious, with China signaling its intent to mediate, motivated by its extensive economic ties with both countries while simultaneously arming them. Travel warnings from U.S. embassies and UN concerns about civilian safety underscore the urgent need for resolution.
As each side prepares for what could become a protracted struggle, the cycle of violence appears destined to continue unless meaningful progress occurs. Historically entrenched grievances, coupled with military prowess and political ramifications, leave an uncertain future for the region.
"*" indicates required fields
