The Trump administration’s second term has ushered in an era of sweeping immigration reforms and national security measures. Following the administration’s intentions, Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized the commitment to “protect our people and preserve our national identity.” This statement encapsulates a year of transformative actions aimed at tightening immigration and redefining American identity.
Since January 2025, President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance have enacted over 40 executive orders and proclamations focused on immigration and foreign policy. These directives are framed around three primary objectives: national security, economic protection, and cultural preservation. The administration’s approach is characterized by decisive and often controversial measures targeting both legal and illegal immigration.
Border Enforcement and Military Presence
A cornerstone of the administration’s strategy has been Executive Order 14167, which mobilized about 10,000 military personnel to the southern border by March. This action is part of a broader effort to deter illegal crossings and regain control over the U.S. border. According to Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, “There is no sovereign nation without a secure border.” The commitment to border security is evident, with infrastructure projects underway to strengthen physical barriers against unauthorized entry.
Visa Changes and Legal Immigration Constraints
Legal immigration has also undergone significant alterations. A notable development came with a proclamation that imposed a $100,000 fee per H-1B visa petition. This move has drawn criticism as it may restrict access to skilled international professionals unless supported by major corporations. Earlier actions included barring foreign nationals affiliated with certain educational institutions based on perceived national security risks. The administration’s scrutiny extends to universities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), indicating a thorough examination of foreign influences deemed threatening.
Expanded Travel Restrictions
The revival of travel bans has become another hallmark of this administration. Currently, nationals from twelve countries face complete U.S. entry prohibitions, while seven others have partial restrictions. Critics assert that these policies effectively limit immigration from developing nations and raise concerns about the implications for human rights. The Department of Homeland Security’s enhanced visa processing now involves rigorous biometric and ideological vetting, imposing stringent oversight on foreign nationals seeking entry.
International Education Under Pressure
International students—once viewed as vital contributors to American innovation—are facing increased scrutiny. Since February, thousands of student visas have been terminated, and the issuance of F-1 and J-1 visas has decreased dramatically. The suspension of the Optional Practical Training program adds further complications for international graduates aiming to gain work experience in the U.S. The administration’s decision to shift oversight of international education from the Department of Education to the State Department illustrates an effort to intertwine educational access with broader foreign policy priorities.
Federal Employment and Diversity Initiatives
The administration’s internal reforms include a mass reduction of the federal workforce, initiated through executive orders to dissolve diversity and equity initiatives. Reports indicate that approximately 17% of federal positions are targeted for elimination, particularly efforts established under previous administrations. The rationale provided is that “Taxpayer money should not be used to indoctrinate or divide,” as outlined in government documents conveying the administration’s objectives.
Changes to Foreign Aid and NGO Funding
Foreign aid policies have also shifted significantly. Funding assistance to multiple nations has been curtailed or redirected, now contingent upon their cooperation with U.S. deportation efforts and immigration security. This reallocation demonstrates a stringent stance where foreign regimes perceived as hostile face reduced support. Secretary Rubio articulated the administration’s firm stance by stating, “American taxpayers will no longer underwrite our own dysfunction.”
Wider Economic Implications
The ramifications of the administration’s immigration policies extend beyond borders into critical sectors of the U.S. economy. Higher education officials predict that declining enrollment from international students may result in losses exceeding $7 billion annually, jeopardizing thousands of jobs tied to education. The tech industry is expressing similar concerns; leaders are wary that formidable barriers for H-1B visas will prompt top engineering talent to migrate to more welcoming markets abroad. Healthcare systems are also grappling with a growing physician shortage, as thousands of medical residents are blocked from placements in U.S. hospitals. Rural public health systems could face dire challenges as a result.
Legal Challenges Ahead
Several of the administration’s policies are now being contested in the courts. Federal judges have issued temporary restraining orders against key actions, highlighting legal tensions surrounding immigration practices. On the horizon, Supreme Court hearings are anticipated regarding birthright citizenship, further adding to the uncertainty enveloping the administration’s immigration agenda.
Despite the legal disputes and public dissent, a solid base of support remains among Trump’s followers. Polls indicate that many Republican voters view these immigration cuts favorably, with a significant portion citing “cultural preservation” as a driving factor behind their support.
The stark moves within immigration and national security policy manifest the administration’s commitment to a vision of America defined by strict border control and cultural integrity. Secretary Rubio’s declaration reflects a focus on ensuring that the nation retains its character and sovereignty. As the administration marches forward, it will solidify its legacy through a series of policies aimed at curbing immigration and reinforcing national identity.
"*" indicates required fields
