In the landscape of presidential approval ratings, a striking story unfolds, highlighting the resilience and tenacity of leaders even in the face of overwhelming criticism. Recent data from RealClear Polling illustrates that President Donald Trump’s second-term approval ratings have consistently surpassed those of former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush during the early years of their own second terms. This achievement is remarkable when one considers the media narratives that surround each presidency.
Bush, for instance, started 2005 with an approval rating hovering around 51 percent. Despite facing hurdles, that rating held steady through mid-year but faced a dramatic decline, dropping to as low as 38 percent by November. Similarly, Obama commenced 2013 strong, boasting an approval rating above 52 percent, but saw that number tumble down to around 40 percent by December of that same year. The data for Trump tells a different tale. He entered 2025 with a notably high 51 percent approval rating, which currently sits at 44 percent. Trump’s experience stands out: while Bush and Obama both saw double-digit drops, Trump’s ratings have steadily exceeded those of his predecessors.
What makes these figures even more striking is the context of media coverage. Studies have revealed that Trump’s tenure has been riddled with a staggering 92 to 95 percent negative media portrayal. This relentless barrage of negativity from establishment media outlets has persisted throughout his presidency. The implications are significant. Despite the unfavorable coverage, Trump still maintains approval ratings that outshine those of his predecessors. This resilience amidst adversity suggests a deeper connection with his base and a rejection of the narratives being spun by the mainstream media.
In a recent comment, Obama defended the establishment media by stating, “I actually think that the mainstream news still does a very good job of just presenting facts.” This statement, delivered with a sense of conviction, appears disconnected from the reality many see in media reporting today. The irony lies in the fact that when faced with such negative coverage, one might reasonably question the objectivity of the media’s portrayal. If Obama received favorable coverage throughout his administration, one could understand why he would maintain such a stance.
The truly remarkable aspect of the current approval ratings is that Trump has maintained a lead over Obama in approval nearly every day since July. This speaks volumes about the perceptions held by the electorate. Even faced with mountain-sized obstacles, Trump continues to resonate with a significant portion of the American public. While recent elections did not bring the Republican Party the hoped-for successes, Trump’s enduring appeal cannot be dismissed outright.
In summary, Trump’s ability to surpass the approval ratings of Bush and Obama during their second terms amidst negative media coverage reflects a unique standing among modern presidents. As the Republican Party navigates through its recent challenges, the fact remains that Trump’s approval ratings not only illustrate a continued relevance but also shine a light on the growing disconnect between media narratives and public sentiment. This divergence indicates a potential shift in how future administrations might engage with the electorate amidst a backdrop of skepticism towards traditional media outlets.
"*" indicates required fields
