During a recent episode of Fox News Channel’s “The Five,” Jesse Watters and Jessica Tarlov clashed over controversial figure Jeffrey Epstein, igniting a heated discussion around political connections. Watters took aim at Democrats while pointing out that former President Donald Trump severed ties with Epstein long before Epstein’s legal troubles came to light. “What does it say about Donald Trump,” Watters posed, “that of all the people he’s associated with over his entire career, this was the one guy he cut ties with over 20 years ago?”
Watters highlighted Trump’s decisive break from Epstein as a sign of prudence. He underscored that it was common knowledge in their Palm Beach circles that Epstein was a man to avoid, saying, “It was an open secret.” This framing portrays Trump not only as a savvy businessman but also as someone who recognized the scandalous reputation Epstein carried. Watters’ assertion was sharp: Trump had “caught him cold” and swiftly acted, emphasizing Trump’s brand and business interests.
As the dialogue turned more contentious, Watters shifted his focus to Tarlov, challenging her to acknowledge the grave associations Democrats had with Epstein. “No person wants anything to do with a guy named Jeffrey Epstein except Democrats,” he remarked, painting them as hypocrites for mingling with someone with Epstein’s history after his conviction. He even referenced a notorious photograph of Bill Clinton allegedly receiving a massage on Epstein’s aircraft to illustrate his point.
Watters continued to deflect allegations against Trump by questioning the logic behind claims of blackmail, positing that if Epstein had any compromising information on Trump, he would have used it. “Why wouldn’t he just drop the hammer?” he asked, casting doubt on the motives behind the accusations. This rhetorical device highlighted a perceived inconsistency in the narrative surrounding Trump’s alleged connections to Epstein.
Further along in the segment, Watters brought it back to Trump’s role in Epstein’s eventual arrest, arguing that the former president should be credited rather than vilified. “Trump was the one who arrested him,” Watters emphasized, while contrasting this with the Democrats’ acceptance of Epstein’s donations. This juxtaposition sought to position Trump as an anti-establishment figure taking a stand against the very individuals who had failed to sever ties with Epstein.
Watters broadened his critique, listing other prominent figures, including Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, suggesting that Democrats frequently aligned themselves with those who had serious moral and legal failings. “You build these anti-Trump cases around… convicted felons, porn stars, and pedophiles,” he asserted, questioning the effectiveness of such strategies against Trump.
Tarlov’s rebuttals, marked by sarcasm and frustration, added to the dynamic. Watters was clear in his belief that the accumulation of scandals and accusations would not bring down Trump. He dismissed the impact of information coming from a “dead pedophile, Democrat donor,” reinforcing his assertion that such tactics were insufficient to damage Trump’s standing.
Ultimately, the confrontation between Watters and Tarlov illuminates broader themes of accountability, character, and political strategy. It showcases how both sides use figures like Epstein to frame narratives, either discrediting or deflecting attention from their own controversial associations. Watters’ remarks reflect a common narrative among conservatives that seeks to redefine accountability and highlight perceived double standards in political conduct.
"*" indicates required fields
