Trump’s Bold Move in FIFA and What It Means for Global Sports
Donald Trump’s presence at a recent FIFA World Cup event has put him in the spotlight, capturing the attention of international media and signaling his increasing influence in sports diplomacy. The former president was seen engaging with reporters on the red carpet, a clear indication of how he remains a magnetic figure in both politics and global sports. A tweet showcased the moment, emphasizing the media frenzy: “President Trump is getting SWARMED by international media on the red carpet for FIFA, he’s on a ROLL right now.” This highlights how Trump continues to harness public interest as the 2026 tournament approaches.
Central to this event was a remarkable development. FIFA President Gianni Infantino awarded Trump a newly created FIFA Peace Prize without seeking approval from FIFA’s governing council. This unprecedented step reflects a significant shift in how FIFA is positioning itself under new strategic alignments. With the United States set to host a large portion of the World Cup matches alongside Canada and Mexico, Infantino’s choice to honor Trump highlights a desire for close cooperation with U.S. political leadership.
The implications are substantial. The upcoming tournament will feature 48 teams and over a hundred matches stretched across multiple cities. The stakes are high—not just in terms of sporting achievement but also regarding diplomatic relations and economic impact. FIFA’s need for streamlined operations has led to innovative approaches, such as the creation of a new visa application system called the “FIFA Prioritized Appointments Scheduling System” (PASS). This initiative aims to speed up visa interview processing times, a crucial factor to ensure the smooth arrival of international fans.
Infantino articulated the significance of this initiative, stating, “Tickets sold are record breaking… Safety and security are the No. 1 priority for a successful World Cup.” Echoing this sentiment, Trump expressed readiness to assist local authorities: “If they want help during this, I would love to send in National Guard or whoever is necessary… We can be in there on 24 hours notice.” This willingness indicates a proactive approach to maintaining security and ensuring the event’s success.
Yet, this bold collaboration is not without its challenges. Within FIFA, officials like Vice President Victor Montagliani and UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin have raised concerns about the direction of FIFA’s governance and its potential politicization. The awarding of a peace prize to a political figure poses questions about maintaining neutrality in sports, as expressed by former FIFA governance chair Miguel Maduro.
The complexities grow when considering national teams’ concerns related to U.S. immigration policies. Iran’s national team narrowly avoided a boycott over visa delays for their coaching staff, while Haiti and Japan expressed worries about travel restrictions in host cities. These issues reflect the intricate balance FIFA must strike between ensuring operational fluidity and navigating geopolitical sensitivities.
At the event held in Washington, D.C., Trump’s role was prominent. His interactions with other global leaders, including Canada’s Prime Minister and Mexico’s President, underscored his presence on the international stage. The event even attracted big names from sports and entertainment, amplifying its significance.
Originally set to take place in Las Vegas, logistical challenges forced a location change. Steve Hill, head of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, acknowledged the difficulties in securing a venue, saying, “Locating a suitable venue and room blocks was a little bit of a challenge because of everything going on in the city.” This reflects the broader complexities surrounding the event, as organizational hurdles can impact planning directly.
Despite criticism around his growing visibility, Trump’s relationship with Infantino appears to be one built on mutual benefit. Their joint appearances at high-profile events reinforce a partnership that may reshape the future of international sports governance. The creation of the FIFA Peace Prize, never issued before, raises eyebrows about FIFA’s accountability and may endanger the organization’s longstanding effort to keep politics out of sport.
Nevertheless, Infantino seems resolute in his strategy, noting the commercial potential of a U.S.-hosted World Cup: “It’s not just about soccer,” he stated. “It’s about building something that can last, and he [Infantino] sees Trump as a key player in that equation.” This points to the view that the intersection of sports and politics is becoming increasingly important as FIFA seeks to optimize financial gains.
Financial projections suggest the 2026 tournament will break previous revenue records, potentially exceeding $11 billion. This figure highlights FIFA’s ambition to solidify a lucrative foothold in North America, with plans for expanded attendance and revenue generation.
Overall, the alignment between Trump and FIFA may have lasting consequences for how sports and politics interact in the future. Trump’s strong stance on security and governance during the tournament has raised the stakes, indicating that host cities that do not meet his standards may face serious repercussions. “The governors are going to have to behave, the mayors are going to have to behave,” Trump warned. “We’re ready to pull matches if need be.”
As anticipation builds for the 2026 World Cup, all eyes are on how these dynamics will unfold. With Trump’s political weight and FIFA’s commercial aspirations at the forefront, this partnership may redefine sports diplomacy. Whether the audacious approach proves beneficial or provokes backlash remains to be seen, but for now, America—and Trump—stands at the center of the global game, with much riding on how it plays out.
"*" indicates required fields
