The latest move by President Donald Trump to mock leading late-night hosts encapsulates more than just a playful jab; it highlights significant shifts in the television landscape. On Wednesday morning at 12:30 a.m., he posted a poll on Truth Social, asking his followers who they deemed the “WORST” among Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, and Jimmy Fallon. This isn’t merely entertainment; it’s a reflection of a broader trend affecting the industry.
Trump’s commentary emerges after CBS announced the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, a decision he quickly used to bolster his critique of mainstream media figures. During a press conference, Trump said, “Colbert has no talent. Fallon has no talent. Kimmel has no talent. They’re next.” His brash declarations illustrate a confrontation between a sitting president and the entertainment world, indicating a deeper scrutiny of comedians and their connection to a changing audience.
The late-night format has seen heavy shifts in viewership, particularly over the last decade. CBS cited financial strains as a reason for Colbert’s cancellation, emphasizing that this was about a “challenging backdrop in late night” rather than political motivations. However, critics, especially Trump, argue that politically charged humor has run its course, claiming Colbert’s brand lacked audience appeal. Trump even hailed Colbert’s exit, suggesting, “His talent was even less than his ratings.” This statement highlights an underlying belief that audience tastes are evolving away from the progressive narratives that characterized late-night programming during Colbert and his contemporaries’ reigns.
The Ratings Decline
The data tells a stark story, reflecting a sharp downfall for Colbert and his peers. Once peaking at over 3 million viewers in 2017, ratings for The Late Show have fallen by nearly 45%, plunging below 1.7 million by early 2024. Comparably, The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon has dwindled to below 1.3 million from its once robust 4 million. Kimmel’s ratings are hovering just above 1.5 million. In stark contrast, Fox News’ Gutfeld! has captured an audience of around 2.2 million, positioning it as a strong alternative and suggesting the potential pull of conservative voices in late-night slots.
For many, these shifts signal a disconnect between the entertainment industry and a significant portion of the American audience. Trump’s characterization that late-night shows have transformed into platforms for “hate Trump” commentary underscores a mood of disenchantment among his supporters. Late-night programming, often perceived as snarky and politically entrenched, risks alienating viewers who don’t resonate with such themes.
A Broader Critique
Trump’s critiques extend to figures like Howard Stern, whose previously rebellious persona has faltered in recent years. Trump’s assertion that Stern’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton in 2016 led to a drop in audience engagement reveals a sentiment that entertainment voices must align more closely with their viewers’ values. This notion resonates with many who feel that formerly anti-establishment figures are becoming entrenched in the mainstream.
Despite Trump’s biting remarks, some in the television industry have rallied behind Colbert, with fellow late-night host Andy Cohen calling the cancellation “a sad day for late-night television.” Cohen described Colbert as “a singular talent” and insisted that there is an “incredible next chapter” ahead for him. This juxtaposition highlights a divide: while some see a creative void left behind, others perceive an opportunity for new talent that aligns with audience expectations.
Changing Dynamics
As late-night television evolves, it is essential to consider the political implications of its recent trajectory. High-profile hosts’ emotional reactions to Trump’s electoral successes reveal their inclination toward partisan expressions, further enfolding their programs in political messaging. Fallon’s comments on Trump’s comeback and Kimmel’s quips showcase a shared concern that may rankle a segment of the viewership, reinforcing partisan divides rather than unifying audiences.
In an era where entertainment is scrutinized for both its content and political leanings, the implications of declining ratings cannot be overlooked. Trump’s posts may appear flippant on the surface, yet they speak to a significant transformation in how audiences consume television. As legacy networks rethink investments amid receding viewership, it becomes crucial for them to reconnect with an audience increasingly hungry for relatable, less polarizing content.
The fate of late-night television remains uncertain. With a tide of changing viewer expectations and the rise of conservative alternatives, the traditional landscape is shifting. The emergence of Trump as a commentator on this evolution adds a new layer to the conversation and illustrates the precarious balance between entertainment, politics, and viewer engagement. As CBS grapples with the practicalities of its programming decisions, Trump’s presence looms large, serving as both a barometer of public opinion and a provocateur in a swiftly changing media environment.
"*" indicates required fields
