Trump Amplifies Concerns Over Minnesota’s Voter ‘Vouching’ Rules, Echoing Scott Presler’s Alarms
The current discourse surrounding Minnesota’s voter registration system reveals significant unease about the practice of “vouching.” Former President Donald Trump has expressed his support for criticism aimed at this policy, which allows registered voters to vouch for others without the need for photo identification or proof of residency. This move coincides with an investigation led by Scott Presler, a conservative activist who has taken a firm stance against what he sees as a vulnerable electoral process.
In a widely circulated tweet, Presler described how Minnesota law enables same-day voter registration through vouching. This process allows one registered voter to verify the residency of up to eight individuals. “Just my vouching and you guys signing an oath declaring you follow the law? You’re handed ballots and can vote!” he pointedly remarked. This straightforward assertion captures the essence of the concern: the system lacks essential safeguards.
Vouching has been a legal practice in Minnesota for over fifty years. It allows a registered voter from the same precinct to accompany individuals lacking proof of residency, with the ability to sign an oath certifying their address. However, critics argue that this process is susceptible to abuse, particularly when coupled with other state policies that seem to weaken residency and citizenship checks.
Recent developments regarding the integrity of Minnesota’s elections coincide with concerns arising from other areas of the state. The U.S. Department of Justice has successfully prosecuted many individuals involved in welfare fraud in Minnesota, pointing to deeper vulnerabilities in state-administered programs. This scrutiny heightens the alarm over potential exploitation within the voting system as well.
Presler directly linked these fraud cases to the voting system’s weaknesses, asserting, “Does this allow for potential fraud and abuse of our elections? Absolutely—especially when you consider that Minnesota has same-day voter registration.” His comments resonate within a landscape rife with anxiety over election integrity.
In particular, vouching is prevalent in assisted living facilities, where residents often fail to update their driver’s licenses. Cassondra Knudson, a representative from the Minnesota Secretary of State’s office, noted that vouching is typically utilized in these environments. Yet the existing law permits workers or residents in these facilities to vouch for an unlimited number of individuals, which has raised concerns from advocates focused on election security.
Compounding these fears is the recent expansion of driver’s license eligibility to non-citizens in Minnesota, enacted under the 2023 “Driver’s Licenses for All” law. This new legislation permits undocumented immigrants to receive licenses that do not differ visually from those issued to citizens. While state officials emphasize that non-citizens cannot cast votes, critics highlight that these licenses are still valid documents for initiating voter registration.
Bill Glahn, a former investment banker, voiced concerns about the potential for abuse in the system. “If you use that to get registered and someone vouches for you, what safeguards are there really? None,” he said, underscoring the serious implications of the policy. Glahn recounted witnessing what he regarded as exploitation of the vouching system first-hand, saying, “I saw somebody doing this—vouching in half a dozen people—and they were laughing and giggling like, ‘I can’t believe this is working.’ And I was infuriated seeing this.”
While the state assures that mechanisms exist to combat fraud—such as post-election audits and cross-checking voter records—questions linger regarding their effectiveness. Glahn raised a pertinent point: “It’s a penalty of perjury. You signed an oath. But if you signed as Mickey Mouse, they’re not going to find you.” This highlights the gaps in enforcing accountability within the vouching process.
Trump’s endorsement of Presler’s warnings may catalyze efforts to impose stricter voting regulations at both the national and state levels. The “Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility” Act, introduced by Sen. Mike Lee, aims to mandate documented proof of citizenship for federal elections and impose penalties on officials who register voters without verifying citizenship. This bill has made significant progress, passing the House and awaiting consideration in the Senate.
Further elevating the issue, Presler’s Early Vote Action group has mobilized to bring national attention to election integrity flaws, compiling evidence, training poll monitors, and gathering statements from voters and election judges. He articulates a vision for comprehensive election reform that emphasizes stricter verification protocols.
Debate over Minnesota’s vouching practices has reached the state legislature’s floor, where Republican representatives have proposed legislation to limit or eliminate vouching altogether. They argue that its existence opens avenues for fraudulent registration. Although no new restrictions have passed as of mid-2024, discussions continue, with opposing views from Democratic lawmakers and advocacy groups advocating for accessible voting.
Paul Linnell, the Minnesota Elections Director, insisted that vouching does not allow for anonymous voting. “They still must provide a name, date of birth, and some form of identifier such as the last four digits of their Social Security number,” he stated. This claim seeks to assure the public of oversight, but skepticism remains regarding the sufficiency of such measures.
The crux of the debate hinges on whether a sworn oath can supplant tangible proof of residency or citizenship when it comes to voting. The focus sharpens as scrutiny of Minnesota’s system intensifies, prompting policymakers to balance access with security considerations. The long-standing vouching policy may have originated from good intentions, but today’s complexities—marked by widespread identification debates and increasing migrant populations—demand reevaluation that extends beyond Minnesota’s borders.
“Trust, but verify,” Presler aptly remarked during a recent event. “If you can’t verify who’s voting, you’re just asking for trouble.” As the 2024 election cycle advances, the outcomes of these discussions will likely influence broader national conversations about election integrity and immigration policy. The direction taken by Minnesota regarding vouching will be crucial in shaping future legislative priorities.
"*" indicates required fields
