The recent confirmation from President Trump regarding strikes on Venezuelan territory marks a significant escalation in the U.S. military’s approach to combat narcotics trafficking and terrorism. The operation targeted a facility on Venezuela’s coast that was reportedly used to load boats with drugs. Trump highlighted the details during a speech at Mar-a-Lago, stating, “There was a major explosion at the implementation area,” although he stopped short of identifying which branch of the military was involved.
This latest military action represents a notable shift from previous tactics employed since the launch of the anti-narcotics campaign in September 2025. Up until now, the United States has largely relied on maritime strikes, executing approximately 29 operations that destroyed 30 vessels and resulted in over 100 fatalities among individuals categorized as “narcoterrorists.” The deployment of 15,000 troops and multiple warships, including the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group, underscores the extent of U.S. military engagement in the region.
Despite the absence of formal confirmation from the Pentagon or the CIA regarding the December strike, the implications of such actions cannot be understated. Legal experts point out the potential violations of international law, suggesting that military strikes on another nation’s sovereign territory without proper authorization could prompt a response from Venezuela under the UN Charter. This escalation raises questions about the United States’ adherence to international norms while engaging in covert actions authorized by Trump and his administration.
The Venezuelan government has reacted with indignation. Vice President Delcy Rodríguez described Trump’s actions as attempts to steal national wealth. Amidst these accusations, the Maduro regime maintains that it would mobilize four million militia members in retaliation for U.S. actions. However, this rhetoric contrasts sharply with the reality on the ground, as Venezuela has yet to launch any significant military response to the ongoing U.S. operations.
Venezuela’s military capabilities are severely diminished, hampered by sanctions and resource shortages. The nation’s air force, comprising F-16s and Su-30MK2s, has drastically reduced operational capacity, with only a handful of planes ready for action. The ineffectiveness of Venezuela’s naval forces, limited to a single functional frigate and a Type-209 submarine, underscores the challenges it faces in confronting U.S. maritime power.
Military analysts emphasize that Venezuela’s doctrine seems to rely on asymmetric resistance tactics designed for guerrilla warfare and urban disruption. While the regime claims to have around 280 trained militia units, the practicality of these tactics in the face of overwhelming U.S. firepower is questionable. The current strategy does not adequately address the challenges posed by air strikes and maritime blockades, which can bypass conventional military preparations.
Furthermore, the internal condition of Venezuela’s armed forces reflects further disarray. Reports about low morale, compounded by shortages of basic supplies and food, indicate a floundering military structure unsure of its own capabilities. As Maduro continues to suppress opposition within the country, leveraging nationalist sentiments, he simultaneously limits any possible actions that could justify a full-scale U.S. invasion.
Internationally, diplomatic support from notable allies like Russia and China does not translate into military assistance. These nations have provided a layer of political backing at forums such as the UN Security Council, but analysts agree that they are unlikely to defend Venezuela militarily against U.S. operations. China’s ongoing purchase of discounted Venezuelan oil indicates a reliance on economic benefits rather than military alliances.
The ramifications of current U.S. strategies are profound. The potential for U.S. forces to establish air and sea control within days suggests that any full-scale invasion could unfold rapidly. However, the logistical and political complexities of such an operation—requiring more than 100,000 troops and facing the specter of urban warfare—explain the cautious approach taken by the U.S. administration. Thus far, the objective has shifted towards pressuring Maduro rather than pursuing occupation, highlighting the tactical recalibrations in response to the region’s dynamics.
As tensions escalate and military actions unfold, the situation remains fluid. The confrontation between U.S. forces and the Maduro regime will likely shape the geopolitical landscape of the region significantly in the months ahead.
"*" indicates required fields
