Understanding the Standoff Between Federal Authorities and Colorado Over CDLs
The current clash between the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Colorado state government shines a light on several key issues: regulatory compliance, public safety, and the standards governing commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs). The Department’s ultimatum stems from an October audit revealing that nearly a quarter of Colorado’s CDLs issued to non-domiciled individuals were granted in violation of federal law. This discrepancy has created a pressing situation that could have serious ramifications for the state.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has made it clear that Colorado’s actions, or lack thereof, put public safety at risk. In his own words, “Colorado doesn’t get to pick and choose what federal rules it follows… especially when the driving public is at risk.” His criticism underscores a federal expectation that state policies align with national standards, particularly in areas where safety is concerned.
The heart of the issue lies in Colorado’s 2016 policy allowing CDLs for individuals not legally authorized to remain in the United States. This move has not only been viewed as defiance against federal guidelines but also as a potential contributor to road hazards. The recent audit was prompted by a tragic accident in Florida involving an unqualified truck driver, highlighting the stakes involved. Duffy referred to the everyday risks posed by “unqualified, unvetted foreign truckers,” emphasizing that each day without corrective action increases the chances of more incidents.
Colorado’s response has raised eyebrows. Despite admitting to breaking the law, the state has been slow to revoke the invalid licenses and complete the required audit. Duffy’s remarks reflect frustration with Colorado’s apparent “slow walking” of compliance, and the state has not yet provided a clear resolution. The fact that Colorado paused new CDLs for foreign nationals while conducting a review does not absolve it from accountability. The ongoing delay has fueled federal officials’ calls for immediate action, including the potential loss of $24 million in federal funding.
At the crux of this showdown is a significant number of CDLs. With over 126,000 valid CDL holders in Colorado, including nearly 1,800 with term-limited immigration status, the implications of mismanaged licenses extend well beyond simple policy breaches. These licenses, obtained without proper vetting through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, expose the public to risks from inadequately trained drivers operating heavy vehicles on public roads.
Add to this mix the political nuances of the situation. Colorado Governor Jared Polis has attempted to frame the federal scrutiny as partisan, but Duffy’s insistence that this is fundamentally about public safety gives context to the urgency. The broader implications of the federal audit also reflect a growing concern across other states, with similar issues surfacing in California, New York, and others. This suggests that Colorado’s predicament is part of a more extensive scrutiny of CDL issuance practices nationally.
As this impasse continues, Colorado faces pressure not only to comply quickly with federal demands but also to salvage its commercial driver licensing program from jeopardy. The stakes are high: a failure to act could lead to a decertification of the entire program, halting the issuance of new licenses and, in turn, disrupting crucial aspects of the state’s freight and logistics sectors.
The outcome of this showdown is still unfolding. Duffy has laid it out plainly: “Colorado has two options: revoke the licenses immediately, or I will pull federal funding.” It remains to be seen how the state will respond, but one thing is evident—this confrontation underscores the critical need for adherence to established safety practices and regulations in the transportation sector.
"*" indicates required fields
