The Trump administration is currently deliberating potential terrorism-related sanctions against the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). Reports indicate that officials are scrutinizing claims of the agency’s alleged connections to Hamas. This move could intensify pressure on UNRWA’s leadership and operations, which provide vital aid to millions of Palestinians across various regions.
UNRWA has long served as the backbone of aid efforts in Gaza, especially amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. However, allegations from the Trump administration suggest that UNRWA may be linked to terrorist activities. The agency has strongly denied these assertions, defending its role in humanitarian efforts. Secretary of State Marco Rubio referred to UNRWA as a “subsidiary of Hamas,” highlighting skepticism from the U.S. government toward the agency’s activities.
In January 2024, U.S. funding for UNRWA was frozen after Israeli officials raised concerns about the involvement of some UNRWA staff in the deadly October 7 Hamas attack. The U.S. was previously a major donor to the agency, but this suspension reflects growing tensions and distrust toward UNRWA following these incidents.
The potential for sanctions is still being discussed, with varying opinions within the State Department about whether to target the agency as a whole or specific individuals and their actions. Suggestions include classifying UNRWA as a “foreign terrorist organization” (FTO), a designation that would severely limit its operations and funding. Such a move would be unprecedented, given that the U.S. is a member of the United Nations and has historically played a significant role in establishing UNRWA.
William Deere, UNRWA’s representative in Washington, expressed disappointment at the prospect of an FTO designation, asserting it would be “unprecedented and unwarranted.” He referenced multiple investigations that deemed UNRWA an essential and neutral humanitarian actor, which adds complexity to the current discussions.
The ongoing scrutiny of UNRWA comes at a time when the agency is already grappling with a funding crisis. Imposing sanctions could hinder its ability to provide necessary assistance to Palestinian refugees, a move that would have far-reaching implications for humanitarian efforts in the region. While criticisms from Israel and the U.S. regarding UNRWA’s impartiality have intensified, the agency’s findings from its own internal investigations have shown varying results. Out of 19 employees examined, nine were dismissed due to findings that implicated them in wrongdoing, while others were cleared or found lacking sufficient evidence for involvement.
The dynamic surrounding UNRWA presents a significant challenge as it navigates a complex geopolitical landscape. Tensions are further amplified by the volatile nature of relations in the region, particularly following the aftermath of the October conflict. The potential sanctions, if pursued, could not only affect the agency but also the lives of millions who rely on its services.
As these discussions unfold, responses from the White House and the State Department will likely shape public perception and the operational future of UNRWA. The situation remains fluid, with the ultimate outcomes resting on both diplomatic negotiations and the agency’s ability to address the growing concerns raised by the U.S. and Israel.
"*" indicates required fields
