Widespread Fraud in Minnesota’s Medicaid and Child Care Programs: An Ongoing Investigation
The recent investigation into Minnesota’s Medicaid and child care systems conducted by NewsNation’s Rich McHugh reveals alarming evidence of fraud. Reports indicate that one building alone may house as many as 60 different “healthcare” businesses, many of which seem to be mere facades. McHugh describes these establishments: “They appear to be just window fronts, door fronts with nothing, with nobody behind.” From the evidence gathered, it’s clear that federal scrutiny is warranted.
A nationwide federal crackdown on financial abuses related to child care and Medicaid programs has been sparked by these findings. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a freeze of the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) disbursements, citing the rampant fraud in Minnesota as a significant factor. HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill expressed the seriousness of the situation, labeling the unfolding fraud as “blatant.”
Federal investigators are particularly focused on Minneapolis, where daycare centers and home healthcare providers run by the Somali community are under examination. NewsNation’s investigation on New Year’s Eve found numerous healthcare facilities either closed or seemingly abandoned during business hours. The data revealed stunning anomalies, such as one address listed with 60 different registered healthcare entities. These findings illustrate a concerning pattern of mismanagement and potential fraud in the state’s Medicaid and child care sectors.
To address the rampant fraud, HHS has now mandated that states provide thorough documentation—receipts, photographs, and other proof—before CCDF funds can be disbursed. In fiscal year 2024, Minnesota received over $172 million in CCDF federal funds, with $31 million allocated for improving care. However, these funds will be held until proper use is verified by state agencies. As scrutiny surrounding these programs grows, child care providers across the nation are impacted by these federal measures. Minnesota, however, remains the focal point of this investigation.
Republican state Representative Kristin Robbins, who chairs the Minnesota House Oversight Committee, has expressed alarm over these developments. She emphasized the need for federal scrutiny into Minnesota’s Medicaid and child care systems months before this investigation. “Other states should be looking at their Medicaid-funded programs for these signs of fraud,” Robbins warned. The representative also highlighted the concerning potential for the fraudulent practices to extend beyond Minnesota, stating, “Once they figured out the business model, that [fraud] has been exported to other states.”
The alleged business model appears to exploit home and community-based services (HCBS), a crucial element of Medicaid’s strategy to provide community alternatives to institutional care. These programs, which cover a range of services from personal assistance to home modifications, may lack the oversight typical of traditional healthcare providers, making them ripe for exploitation.
Investigations into registration records and property listings reveal a puzzling concentration of home healthcare and daycare businesses in a limited number of buildings. Many of these entities show no evidence of legitimate operations—no employees, customers, or even active phone lines—yet they remain licensed and eligible for reimbursement claims. This raises significant concerns about the regulatory oversight in place.
In a related case, Gandi Mohamed, also known as Gandi Abdi Kediye, was indicted for laundering over $1 million connected to the “Feeding Our Future” scandal. Yet, despite his charges, Medicaid payments to his assisted living facilities continued. State data indicates his properties received over $2.3 million in 2023. The Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) justified these payments, citing that Mohamed is categorized as a landlord, not a direct operator. Critics, however, argue that this legal loophole underscores an inadequate vetting process, especially for those involved in the Feeding Our Future case. “It’s unconscionable that they haven’t done the most basic due diligence,” Rep. Robbins commented on the situation.
Records show that Mohamed’s facilities are located in suburban areas of Minneapolis, where there is a significant concentration of Medicaid-funded assisted living sites. The financial growth of these services in regions like Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn Center far surpasses enrollment figures, generating concern among state auditors and lawmakers.
The broader implications of these fraudulent activities are troubling. The federal government has clearly stated that verifiable documentation will be mandatory for all future CCDF claims. The ongoing spotlight on Minnesota suggests that the extent of this fraudulent operation may still be unraveling. Investigators are looking into at least 15 different Medicaid pathways for potential fraud, including home assistance and transportation services.
For those in the healthcare and child care sectors operating within the law, the current scrutiny creates a chilling effect. Payment freezes and audits hinder the ability to provide necessary resources for families and children. Yet, federal officials maintain that such oversight is essential to protect taxpayer dollars and restore public trust.
Despite several operators denying wrongdoing or claiming ignorance regarding the ongoing investigations, growing evidence continues to paint a dark picture. From empty buildings claiming to provide services to registered businesses lacking patient records, the evidence suggests that significant sums are awarded to addresses where no real services are offered.
As Minnesota lawmakers conduct ongoing hearings and federal agencies ramp up investigations, the state stands at the center of a potential national scandal. The possibility of fraudulent models spreading to other areas, as expressed by Rep. Robbins, remains a critical question for investigators moving forward.
"*" indicates required fields
