Avid horror enthusiasts have long debated the “28 Days Later” franchise, and rightly so, as it showcased a compelling alliance of creativity and terror. The original film, directed by Danny Boyle, presented a gripping narrative of a viral outbreak transforming ordinary people into feverish, destructive monsters. It provided a rich canvas for then-unknown actor Cillian Murphy, whose rise to fame began with this groundbreaking work.
However, the sequel, “28 Weeks Later,” took a different direction. Though Boyle did not direct this installment, he played a critical role as executive producer. This film introduced a fresh perspective, diverging the narrative while maintaining the chilling undertones of its predecessor. The years between these entries saw the franchise lay dormant—until last summer’s “28 Years Later,” where Boyle returned as director, reuniting with Murphy, who now stands as an Oscar winner.
The latest addition, “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple,” marks a notable shift in tone and style. Gone are the unrelenting scares that had characterized earlier films, replaced instead by an artistic exploration that still manages to engage. While a grounding in the past films enhances the viewing experience, understanding “28 Years Later” is essential, as events in “The Bone Temple” flow directly from it, drawing on previously established characters.
In “The Bone Temple,” two narrative threads unfold, converging in an explosive climax. The first story centers on Spike, portrayed by Alfie Williams, who escapes from the safety of his island home, seeking adventure on the mainland. He crosses paths with Sir Jimmy Crystal, brilliantly played by Jack O’Connell, a dark cult leader whose twisted ideology ensnares Spike in a web of loyalty and indoctrination. The initiation ceremony is unsettling; it demands the young protagonist to commit an unthinkable act. This moral conflict drives the narrative, prompting viewers to question the cost of survival.
The second plot follows Ian Kelson, portrayed by Ralph Fiennes, previously introduced in “28 Years Later.” Once a respected doctor, he now resides in isolation, consumed by his experiments to reverse the pandemic. The film’s title reflects Ian’s grotesque living quarters—his fortress made of skeletons. Here, he finds a peculiar companion in an alpha zombie, affectionately named Samson. Their connection unfolds into a bizarre yet compelling relationship, echoing the dynamic of classic buddy comedies, albeit with a macabre twist. The dark humor infused in their interactions provides a unique contrast to the dire surroundings.
Interestingly, “The Bone Temple” shifts away from conventional horror tropes that fans might anticipate. Although there are jump scares and graphic violence, the film lacks the deep-seated dread found in its predecessors. “28 Days Later” and “28 Weeks Later” effectively built a foundation of fear and societal collapse; “The Bone Temple” instead veers towards a different landscape, challenging the genre’s parameters. It creates a blend of light-hearted moments amidst horror, as seen through Ian and Samson’s champagne toast to survival—a surreal moment that invites both laughter and contemplation.
The performances elevate the film significantly. Fiennes brings charm and eccentricity to Ian, transforming what could have been a mundane character into the movie’s heart. O’Connell’s portrayal captures the essence of a charismatic yet unnervingly sinister leader, drawing Spike—and the audience—into his orbit. Williams provides a relatable perspective; his character’s coming-of-age journey confronts the loss of innocence in a ravaged world. Erin Kellyman’s role as one of Jimmy’s followers adds a layer of intrigue, as she skillfully blurs the line between ally and adversary.
Nia DaCosta’s direction introduces new visual elements but lacks the distinct flair seen in Boyle’s work. Having demonstrated potential in her previous projects, including “Candyman,” expectations were high; however, the film sometimes feels diluted. Yet, Alex Garland’s writing remains sharp, crafting dialogue that reflects both the absurdity and the darkness of the world the characters inhabit. The balance is delicate, and while some may see the film’s rapid release as a potential misstep, it successfully stands apart enough to warrant its existence within the franchise, offering insights into new dimensions of this expansive zombie narrative.
Though “The Bone Temple” might cater primarily to franchise loyalists, its unique approach could intrigue others who tread carefully into its eerie landscape. Its R rating foretells intense content, which remains true, but the underlying themes explore human dynamics against a backdrop of chaos. Far from a stagnant echo of its predecessors, “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple” enriches the canon of the “28” world, intriguing and perplexing in equal measure—a welcome addition to the ongoing legacy.
With its striking visuals and character-driven narrative, “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple” exemplifies how horror can adapt and evolve while still honoring its chilling roots. As it invites viewers into this complex world, new layers of humanity and madness emerge, making it a thought-provoking installment in a beloved franchise.
"*" indicates required fields
