Analysis: The Impact of Trump’s Return on NATO Spending
This week, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte made a bold statement, attributing the recent surge in defense spending among NATO allies to President Donald Trump’s return to office. His remarks suggest a significant shift in the defense landscape of Europe, one that stems from Trump’s assertive approach to foreign policy and military spending. Rutte did not hold back when he stated, “I asked the room: would 2% have ever happened if Trump had not been elected? No!” This assertion highlights the magnitude of Trump’s influence in pushing NATO allies to fulfill their military commitments.
The backdrop to this spending increase is crucial. Under Trump’s first term, robust criticism was directed at NATO member countries that were not meeting the expected benchmark of 2% of GDP dedicated to defense. At that time, only a handful of nations, including Greece, the U.K., and Estonia, were in compliance. However, by 2023, 23 out of 31 member countries were administering larger defense budgets in response to pressures exerted during Trump’s initial administration.
Rutte’s comments reflect a growing recognition of Trump’s role in shaping NATO’s financial commitments. “Then in June 2025, we agreed to 5% defense spending! Would it have ever happened if Trump was not re-elected? Absolutely not,” he added. This declaration suggests that the newly set targets represent more than just numbers; they mark a pivotal moment in the alliance’s approach to collective defense.
The escalation of defense spending to 5% of GDP, while currently an aspirational target, signals a dramatic shift in NATO’s military posture since Trump’s re-election in January 2025. With member nations like Germany announcing a 45% hike in their 2025 defense budget and France unveiling a massive €75 billion investment plan, it is clear that Trump’s counsel has resonated deeply. This surge follows years of stagnation and minimal growth in military budgets, where mere promises often fell to the wayside amid diplomatic negotiations.
Rutte, a moderate figure, openly stated, “He [Trump] is doing exactly what I hope he would do when he was re-elected.” Such accolades from NATO’s leadership indicate a significant departure from previous years characterized by ambivalence toward defense commitments among European nations.
The current administrative environment in Washington further reinforces these changes. Trump’s team has adopted a no-nonsense approach with NATO allies, demanding accountability and compliance. U.S. officials have indicated that failure to meet defense expectations could lead to troop withdrawals from Europe, a possibility that has clearly motivated member states to boost their military budgets.
Some critics caution that these aggressive spending targets may undermine diplomatic relations and divert resources from social programs. However, as Rutte’s remarks suggest, the emphasis within NATO has shifted toward action rather than debate. The urgency conveyed by NATO insiders is tangible with statements reflecting a newfound proactive leadership style: “The U.S. position is not open to delay.”
Trump’s return evidently marks a significant turning point, galvanizing NATO countries to rethink their military investments. The result of this renewed focus could very well reshape relations within the alliance. On January 28, 2026, Trump encapsulated this sentiment succinctly, stating, “I told them in 2017—start paying your bills. Now they finally are.”
The implications of these developments extend beyond the alliance itself. American defense contractors stand to gain significantly, with a remarkable uptick in European orders for advanced weaponry. Contracts for systems like the Patriot missile and F-35 jets illustrate the alignment of European military needs with American production capabilities.
As NATO military spending is projected to rise dramatically—from $1.3 trillion in 2024 to $1.9 trillion by 2028—the anticipated financial commitments underscore the importance of Trump’s leadership in redefining NATO’s financial landscape. How this pivotal moment will impact unity within the alliance remains uncertain. Yet, it is clear that under Trump, NATO has undergone transformative changes that are affecting its very structure and function on the global stage.
"*" indicates required fields
