The article examines former President Joe Biden’s post-political life, casting it in an unflattering light. It highlights his pension, which exceeds that of any former president, amounting to a staggering $417,000 per year. This figure surpasses what he earned during his presidency, raising eyebrows about the benefits granted to longtime politicians.
Yet, the narrative deepens as it examines Biden’s history of charitable giving. Doug Bandow of the Cato Institute outlined Biden’s minimal financial contributions, revealing that for much of his adult life, Biden donated less than 1 percent of his income to charity. Only in 2017 and 2018, when he sought political relevancy, did his contributions noticeably increase. This sudden shift, likely prompted by political aspirations rather than altruistic motives, adds to skepticism regarding Biden’s true character.
Biden’s rise to the presidency came during a unique set of circumstances, particularly the pandemic. It allowed him to limit his public appearances, raising questions about his suitability as a candidate even before taking office. Critics argue that his past and present actions reflect a lack of accountability and competence, especially in handling significant issues like the withdrawal from Afghanistan and managing the borders.
The article points out the irony in Biden’s wealth as a retiree and the perception of his “public service.” It paints a picture of a man who has thrived off taxpayer money while failing to deliver meaningful results throughout his career. Notably, Biden’s decision-making regarding foreign policy has faced harsh criticism, with Robert Gates stating he was “wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue” over decades. This criticism highlights the perceived disconnect between Biden’s financial privileges and the everyday struggles faced by many Americans.
The narrative suggests that Biden’s legacy will remain clouded by his record in public office — from his Senate career to his presidency. The article also addresses the cycle of financial gain associated with familial connections, hinting at a pattern of “grifters” surrounding Biden, further blurring the lines between public service and personal gain.
In summary, this analysis confronts the notion of Biden’s self-proclaimed service to the nation, contrasting it against the backdrop of a lucrative retirement funded largely by taxpayers who may feel shortchanged by his actions during his lengthy career. The tone is candid and assertive, drawing attention to the contradictions in Biden’s life as a politician and a retiree. The image crafted is one of a man who has thrived in the political arena but has fallen short of the expectations held by voters for genuine public service.
"*" indicates required fields
