A legal battle is unfolding over a controversial California law that restricts public schools from informing parents about their children’s transgender identities. The Thomas More Society, a Catholic legal group, is calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. They seek to restore a federal judge’s ruling that allowed parents with religious objections to opt out of the law’s obligations.
This law, enacted by California Governor Gavin Newsom in 2024, prevents teachers from disclosing a student’s chosen pronouns or gender identity unless specific, vague “compelling” circumstances arise. Critics have labeled these restrictions as “forced outing,” arguing they undermine parental authority and compromise the parent-child relationship. As indicated in the appeal, attorneys for the Thomas More Society assert, “Parents only relinquish authority needed for the school to carry out its ‘educational mission’ … they do not delegate the authority to make decisions regarding whether their child is a boy or a girl.”
Underlying this legal conflict is the permanent injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez last month. He ruled in favor of two teachers in the Escondido Union School District, who argued the law infringed on their constitutional and religious rights. Judge Benitez emphatically stated, “Parents have a right to receive gender information and teachers have a right to provide to parents accurate information about a child’s gender identity.” He affirmed that parents possess a fundamental constitutional right to be informed when their child expresses gender incongruence.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has temporarily halted Benitez’s ruling while California’s attorneys appeal the decision. In this interim period, the law remains in effect, and the situation has drawn significant attention to these contentious education policies in the state. California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office has pledged to defend the law, emphasizing their commitment to the legal arguments in play.
This case is indicative of the larger national discussions regarding parental rights, student privacy, and the role of public schools in sensitive emotional matters. The ongoing scrutiny and debate about educational policies in California and beyond illustrate the complex dynamics at play as courts, educators, and policymakers navigate these pressing issues. The outcome could reverberate across the country, impacting school policies and parental rights at a national level.
"*" indicates required fields
