The recent clip from CNN’s New Year’s Eve 2025 broadcast has sparked reactions that highlight the tumultuous end of Eric Adams’ term as New York City Mayor. Co-host Andy Cohen, visibly intoxicated, did not hold back while criticizing Adams, labeling his time in office as “chaotic” and “horrible.” Cohen’s remarks underscored a broad disdain for Adams, further aggravated by his recent electoral defeat to self-proclaimed socialist Zorhan Mamdani.
Cohen’s commentary began with a clear mockery of Adams’ legacy, as he questioned, “Are we going on a De Blasio style?” This pointed jab suggested a lack of faith in Adams’ leadership, drawing a direct comparison to former Mayor Bill de Blasio, whose tenure was met with significant criticism. As Cohen continued, his drunken tirade linked Adams’ time in office to failed governance, indicating that even at a celebratory event, the failures of leadership were front and center in the discussion.
Remarkably, Cohen’s critique didn’t stop there. He commented on presidential pardons, taunting Adams with phrases like “go dance away.” This comment resonated with a certain irony, reflecting how public figures often face scrutiny during transitional periods. Moreover, Cohen’s ridicule of Adams’ achievements—such as his work on the rat population—further illustrated a broader sentiment among conservatives questioning Adams’ effectiveness. Cohen even conceded, “Mayor Adams did a good job with the rats, right?” before delivering a sarcastic quip, concluding, “There may be less [rats].” This mixture of half-hearted praise and biting sarcasm encapsulates the duality of public perception regarding Adams’ leadership—acknowledging a minor success while dismissing the overarching failures.
As criticism mounted, many New Yorkers remained disheartened by a surge in crime throughout the city during Adams’ time in office. In defending subway safety specifically, Adams asserted that crime rates had dropped significantly, claiming a reduction of 24% in the subway system in March. Yet his insistence that perception does not equate to reality fell flat for many observers who felt everyday experience did not align with his statistics. “We are down in crime in the subway system,” he reiterated, attempting to shift public narrative despite ongoing concerns.
Adams also referenced his tenure as a transit cop, stating that perceptions influence public safety discourse. This notion highlighted a classic tension between subjective experience and objective measures. His defensive posture came across as not just a disagreement with public sentiment but a denial of a deeper issue many saw as a symptom of his leadership. The assertion that he has effectively brought crime down belies the overarching dread that has colored many New Yorkers’ views, illustrating an unsettling disconnect between city leadership and its constituents.
In times of change, particularly in bustling cities like New York, the contrast between actual performance and public perception is critical. Cohen’s rant, while entertaining, reflects a larger narrative laden with frustration for many who felt let down by Adams’ administration. The overall reaction has signaled a clear desire for new leadership that resonates with the challenges of urban life today.
The viral segment on CNN serves as a cultural snapshot, capturing not only the state of a city at a pivotal moment but also the roles played by figures in media and politics during this transition. It reinforced the idea that public sentiment is powerful, and as political tides shift, those at the helm are often left to defend their legacies amidst a chorus of criticism.
"*" indicates required fields
