Both sides of the political spectrum are expressing dissatisfaction with a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill that is set to go to a vote soon, putting Congress’s aim to avoid a government shutdown on January 30 in jeopardy. This bill is part of a broader effort by the GOP to pass four spending bills by week’s end, which also address funding for the War Department, Education, Labor, and Health and Human Services.
Progressive Democrats see the bill as insufficiently protective against potential conflicts between Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and demonstrators. Meanwhile, some Republican lawmakers argue it lacks the necessary measures to fulfill President Trump’s immigration policy objectives. Tim Burchett, a Republican from Tennessee and a known fiscal and border hawk, illustrates this divide clearly. “Everything’s up in the air. If it’s full of garbage, I won’t vote for it,” he stated, expressing his reluctance to support a package he does not personally endorse.
The bill as it currently stands reflects negotiations across party lines and incorporates certain safeguards. Following a tragic incident where ICE agents were involved in the shooting death of Renee Nicole Good in Minnesota, Democrats have pushed for the bill to include measures such as requiring body cameras for ICE officers and new training protocols on public interactions. Furthermore, it largely maintains existing funding levels, even cutting back some financial support for ICE’s operations to deport individuals.
Republican Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania believes the bill could still improve, saying, “If it’s going to be a Republican product, it can be improved.” However, he has not yet committed to a vote. Another point of contention comes from Andy Harris, Chairman of the House Freedom Caucus. He criticized the bill for including provisions that prevent data sharing between government agencies concerning unaccompanied minors. “Data sharing has to occur,” he argued, emphasizing the need for cooperation between DHS and Health and Human Services (HHS) to protect minors from threats such as human trafficking and abuse.
In light of recent developments in Congress, including the passing of Rep. Doug LaMalfa and the resignation of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republicans can only afford to lose two votes on party-line decisions. This constraint heightens the uncertainty surrounding the DHS bill’s prospects for bipartisan support. Democrats, especially members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, have made it clear they will not back any legislation lacking robust guardrails and reforms concerning ICE’s operations.
Rep. Maxine Dexter of Oregon voiced her frustration, saying, “I think what we’re seeing right now is a clear lack of leadership and legal barriers or guardrails for the actions of ICE. I will not vote to fund ICE further.” When assessing the potential fallout from a failed DHS bill, Dexter noted that FEMA and TSA, other crucial parts of the DHS budget, also require attention, but she remains steadfast on the importance of scrutinizing ICE’s influence.
Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar from California recognized the challenges ahead, indicating that legislators must take into account the likelihood of executive compliance with any new requirements that might be added. “All the guardrails in the world don’t make sense if the administration isn’t going to follow the law,” Aguilar emphasized, suggesting that individual members’ decisions will ultimately factor in what best serves their constituents’ interests.
Rep. Ilhan Omar, also a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, summed up the sentiment from progressives by declaring her intent to oppose any funding that lacks strict oversight for ICE. “I will not vote to give ICE a single cent,” she asserted, arguing against what she described as unaccountable agency operations that contribute to violence and infringe upon freedoms.
As the House readies to deliberate on the DHS funding bill, these sentiments depict a broader struggle within Congress to balance security concerns with accountability, showcasing the complexities of modern legislative negotiations surrounding immigration and law enforcement.
"*" indicates required fields
