The Department of Justice (DOJ) has firmly dismissed misleading reports claiming that six officials resigned in protest following the death of anti-ICE activist Renee Good. Good was shot by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer after she attempted to run him over with her SUV. Video evidence indicated that the officer acted in self-defense, as multiple legal experts agreed that the footage showed he was in imminent danger.
A new perspective on the incident, which surfaced online, reveals Good’s vehicle clearly approaching the agent before he fired his weapon. Given that a vehicle can be used as a deadly weapon, the officer’s response appears justified under the circumstances. This self-defense rationale has been echoed by many observers following the incident.
Unsurprisingly, the incident has been exploited by Democrats and various media outlets seeking to incite public outrage and create discord within the Justice Department. Monday saw a flurry of activity after MS Now (previously MSNBC) reported that several DOJ officials had supposedly resigned out of anger over the decision made by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon not to investigate the shooting. Following suit, corporate news outlets like NBC, Reuters, USA Today, and the New York Times quickly followed the narrative without proper scrutiny.
On Tuesday, Dhillon took to social media to denounce the allegations, referring to them as “a lie.” She emphasized that no employees of the division had quit in protest, countering the narrative pushed by MS Now. “This is fake news,” she reiterated in an interview with the Daily Wire, stating that two of the individuals named were present at their desks when the story was reported. Meanwhile, three others had already applied for early retirement before the incident, and a sixth person had initiated retirement a month prior. This clear timeline dismantles the narrative that the resignations were directly related to the shooting.
Dhillon critiqued the media’s role in manufacturing animosity towards the DOJ and ICE, deeming their fabrications as an undermining of their own credibility. “The media’s never-ending attempts to drum up drama and strife within the DOJ are exhausting,” she remarked.
Additionally, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that the DOJ Civil Rights Division would not conduct an investigation into the shooting, stating, “there is currently no basis for a criminal civil rights investigation.” However, the FBI, which operates under the DOJ, is already investigating the circumstances surrounding the January 7 incident, along with the network of activist groups involved in the anti-ICE protests.
Although it is regrettable that violence resulted in the death of someone during the protests, it raises questions about the priorities of those who often demonize law enforcement. Speculation about the potential long-term implications of the incident should focus on how public discourse is shaped and what drives the divisive narratives promoted by some interest groups. In this environment, emotional responses often seem prioritized over constructive dialogue, illustrating a significant challenge in achieving a more cohesive national perspective.
"*" indicates required fields
