During the recent New Year’s Eve live special, Don Lemon and Jim Acosta offered viewers a spectacle that blurred the lines between humor and cringe. Acosta, seemingly enjoying a drink or two, joined remotely from Hawaii, creating a chaotic atmosphere from the start. His opening line, lacking decorum, set the tone: “Aloha, b*tches!” It surprised Lemon, who appeared caught between amusement and discomfort.
Despite Lemon’s clear avoidance of politics and the topic of former President Trump, Acosta pushed forward with his humor, centered around being “so hammered” that even Pete Hegseth would advise him to slow down. Lemon’s awkward laughter indicated his discomfort with such statements. Acosta’s slurred speech and carefree responses—“I’m getting there… It’s been that kind of year, right?”—portrayed him as someone eager to cope with the chaos of 2025 through means that many would argue lack professionalism.
The segment took another odd turn when Acosta professed that “Marjorie Taylor Greene is starting to make sense.” Lemon admonished him for having “politics on the brain,” but Acosta’s heedless comments reflected not just a personal struggle but also highlighted the bizarre landscape of political dialogue today. He seemed to revel in the absurdity, suggesting the challenges of the year were so overwhelming that humor was the only refuge.
Predictably, reactions to Acosta’s antics were mixed. Some liberals celebrated this display as a necessary release from a challenging year, with one commenter noting the need for levity in a “sucked a**” year. This serves as an example of how some segments of viewers have embraced off-script moments, potentially at the expense of professionalism and decorum.
This behavior from Acosta isn’t isolated. He’s known for crossing lines and engaging in contentious exchanges rather than fostering meaningful conversations. This pattern aligns with his previous performances, where he often plays the provocateur. The backlash against his insights, especially from individuals like Karoline Leavitt, illustrates that while he may attract attention, it often comes with harsh criticism. Leavitt’s comeback at CPAC aimed directly at Acosta’s assertions, positioning herself as a counter to his narrative.
While some might argue this kind of television provides entertainment value, it brings up a broader question about the state of discourse in media. Acosta’s behavior—and Lemon’s complicity in allowing such a display—signals a growing acceptance of sensationalism over substance. This trend skews the line between entertainment and journalism, turning platforms for discussion into arenas for spectacle.
In a landscape where viewers increasingly seek authenticity, the question remains: how far will networks allow personalities like Acosta to drift into farce under the banner of comedy? The dynamics at play during that New Year’s Eve show suggest that while ratings and engagement matter, the fallout from a lack of professionalism may tarnish the credibility of those involved, leaving audiences to wonder what they are actually tuning in to watch.
"*" indicates required fields
