A major backlash unfolded against the DoubleTree by Hilton following a decision to eject ICE agents from its St. Paul location. This incident has drawn ire from conservative circles, prompting calls for a nationwide boycott of the hotel chain. The decision, announced under the guise of “safety,” is drawing comparisons to recent high-profile controversies involving other companies perceived to have crossed the line with their policies.
The initial revelation came from Fox News Channel reporter Bill Melugin, who shared a letter from the hotel chain indicating their decision to cancel the agents’ reservations. The letter stated, “Please know that your safety and well-being will always be our top priority,” and cited “heightened public safety concerns” as the reason for the sudden cancellation. This phrasing raises eyebrows, suggesting an attempt to package a politically charged decision within a veneer of concern.
Melugin’s report set the stage for further investigation. Daily Caller reporter Jorge Ventura amplified the situation. In a video update, he noted that the hotel would be closing to provide for the safety of ICE agents, even as “other guests are allowed to stay through their reservation.” This detail highlighted a double standard that many observers found troubling—only the federal employees had to leave, while regular patrons continued their stays uninterrupted.
The public reaction has been swift and pointed. Viewers took to social media to express disdain for DoubleTree and the Hilton brand as a whole. Comments reflected a growing sentiment among conservatives who feel disrespected by businesses that seemingly overlook the role of law enforcement. One commenter articulated the frustration by stating, “It seems either you don’t have a handle on your locations and franchisees, or you’re complicit… and with the amount of times this keeps happening, I am leaning with the latter.”
Others drew parallels to past boycotts of major brands, suggesting that Hilton may face similar consequences to those experienced by Budweiser and Target over recent missteps related to customer sentiments. One comment encapsulated the emerging narrative: “Never stay at another Hilton. Make the same thing that happened to Budweiser… happen to them. A full boycott.”
The decision to remove ICE agents has raised critical questions about the balance between safety and support for law enforcement. Some commenters see Hilton’s actions as misguided, arguing that the decision sends a problematic message of disapproval of federal law enforcement agencies. “This is unwise on Hilton’s part,” one remark pointedly noted about the decision to eject government employees while allowing other guests to remain.
The unfolding situation raises broader implications about how businesses conduct their operations in a politically charged climate. As consumers increasingly demand accountability from companies, the DoubleTree incident may stand as a cautionary tale for brands aiming to navigate these complex dynamics.
This ongoing dialogue reflects a significant moment where public sentiment and corporate decision-making intersect in ways that could reshape customer loyalty across the industry. As the backlash continues, only time will tell how the DoubleTree by Hilton chooses to address the escalating discontent among its patrons.
"*" indicates required fields
