A federal judge has issued a temporary injunction preventing the Trump administration from ending deportation protections for around 200 South Sudanese individuals. This ruling comes from U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley, appointed by President Joe Biden. The judge’s order emphasizes the need to maintain the status quo while the legal proceedings unfold, signaling her concern for the potential impacts on the lives of those affected. “Because of the serious consequences at stake… the Court finds an administrative stay appropriate, as it would ‘minimize harm,’” Kelley wrote, highlighting her sensitivity to the case’s weight.
Temporary Protected Status (TPS) allows individuals from certain countries experiencing turmoil—such as armed conflict or environmental disasters—to remain and work in the U.S. South Sudan first received TPS designation in 2011 after obtaining independence but has since been plagued by instability and violence. The State Department even advises against travel to the region due to safety concerns. Current estimates show that approximately 232 South Sudanese nationals benefit from TPS, a lifeline amid the chaos in their homeland.
As part of the legal challenge, South Dakota’s Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem previously stated that she reviewed conditions in South Sudan and decided to end TPS for the nation. This announcement prompted immediate legal action from South Sudanese TPS holders and the group African Communities Together. The plaintiffs accuse Noem of making her decision based on racial bias and claim the required consultations with federal agencies were neglected, which they argue undermines the justification behind potentially ending the TPS designation.
Judge Kelley intends to deliberate on these claims further, indicating that she recognizes their significance. Her ruling to maintain TPS protections meets the urgent pleas of the plaintiffs, who warned that failing to act could result in “irreparable harm, including deadly harm.” This concern reflects the precarious situation of the Sudanese individuals, emphasizing the critical nature of their status in the U.S.
The Trump administration’s response to the ongoing litigation has been dismissive, arguing that it was inappropriate for the plaintiffs to wait weeks before filing the lawsuit. The Justice Department contends that an administrative stay should merely pause legal processes and shouldn’t be leveraged to stop government action. Judge Kelley rejected this viewpoint, asserting that the immediate risk to the Sudanese nationals would pose a significant issue if deportations were to begin before the court could assess the matter fully.
Kelley’s decision aligns with her recent commentary on the risks of allowing TPS to lapse and the potential implications for those involved. She noted that any lapse in immigration status could render South Sudanese nationals ineligible for future relief, creating additional barriers to their security and stability.
In a related note, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that federal courts do not have the authority to review visa revocations linked to fraudulent marriages for immigration, emphasizing that such matters fall under the purview of Homeland Security. This ruling illustrates the ongoing complexities around immigration law and federal authority.
The temporary ruling by Judge Kelley reinforces the importance of safeguarding the rights of vulnerable populations while legal questions surrounding TPS and immigration policy proceed through the courts. The outcome of this case could have lasting ramifications for South Sudanese nationals and the broader discourse on immigration protections in the United States.
"*" indicates required fields
