Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner has made headlines for his controversial stance on immigration enforcement. During a recent news conference, he expressed his commitment to arrest and prosecute federal immigration agents who allegedly engage in unlawful activities while operating in the city. His remarks were prompted by a tragic event in Minneapolis, where a protester was shot after allegedly attempting to run over an ICE agent. Krasner’s bold assertion, “If any law enforcement agent, any ICE agent is gonna come to Philly to commit crimes, then you can get the F out of here,” clearly indicates his stance against federal agents intervening in local matters.
Krasner’s rhetoric marks a significant shift in his approach to immigration and law enforcement. Since taking office in 2018, he has established the Immigration Counsel position within his office, aimed at providing consultations for cases involving foreign nationals. Initially, he described this role as a means to achieve “immigration-neutral” outcomes, implying the possibility of reduced charges for migrants, even those who might face serious allegations. His office has faced criticism for its engagements in cases involving serious crimes, far beyond the “low-level” offenses he previously suggested would be the focus.
Recent reports reveal that the Immigration Counsel has been involved in various serious criminal cases. The list includes charges of aggravated assault, drug possession with intent to distribute, firearm offenses, and even sexual assaults on minors. This involvement raises questions about the intent behind Krasner’s policies and whether they effectively balance the rights of immigrants with community safety.
Krasner’s refusal to cooperate with ICE is not new. He has openly challenged federal authority regarding immigration enforcement. In 2025, he remarked, “We have an authoritarian president who’s a criminal,” directly opposing directives from federal officials. He contends that the Constitution forbids the commandeering of state law enforcement for federal purposes, drawing an unsettling comparison to authoritarian regimes.
His tenure has been bolstered by support from affluent backers, namely billionaire George Soros, who invested heavily in his election campaign. Krasner aligns with a broader movement among progressive district attorneys who advocate for criminal justice reforms, emphasizing alternatives to incarceration and protection for illegal immigrants. However, such initiatives frequently lead to contentious debates over public safety and accountability.
The implications of Krasner’s policies reach far beyond Philadelphia. They contribute to ongoing national discussions about immigration, law enforcement, and public safety. The controversy surrounding his administration’s handling of migrant cases raises critical questions about the balance between leniency and the protection of citizens from serious criminal behavior. The public will be watching how Krasner’s tough talk towards federal authorities translates into actual enforcement and the broader consequences for local communities.
"*" indicates required fields
