A family member of Lance Twiggs, the transgender boyfriend of Tyler Robinson—who is allegedly tied to the assassination of Charlie Kirk—recently shared insights in an interview with NewsNation. This relationship has drawn attention, particularly given the serious accusations against Robinson following the September 10 shooting at Utah Valley University.
During the segment aired on “NewsNation Live With Nichole Berlie,” Twiggs’ family member expressed strong confidence in the investigation, claiming, “100%, they have the right guy.” This substantial assertion came as a response to inquiries from senior national correspondent Brian Entin, who was probing the community’s theories regarding potential accomplices to the crime.
The family member painted a picture of Robinson’s interaction with law enforcement. While initial reports indicated that he had cooperated with investigators, there were nuances to that cooperation. They noted, “He didn’t voluntarily go in and say, ‘Hey, I heard about this and I have some knowledge.’” This suggests that Robinson’s willingness to share information came under pressure rather than through initiative, raising questions about his full involvement in the troubling incident.
Adding to the complexity, reports indicate that Twiggs has kept a low profile since the assassination attempt, reportedly fleeing his hometown of St. George, Utah, due to threats against himself and his family. This decision to retreat was acknowledged by the family member, who recounted that Twiggs initially had FBI protection but has since returned to his family without such security. Their decision to reduce visibility suggests the profound impact of the events on their lives and the fear that has gripped them.
Complicating the story further, text messages reportedly exchanged between Robinson and Twiggs hint at troubling sentiments. Allegations emerged that Robinson expressed frustration, saying, “I had enough of his hatred.” This troubled communication implies deeper psychological undercurrents leading to the assassination. The comments from Robinson’s parents, noting a shift in his beliefs toward LGBTQ+ rights, underscore a potential internal conflict within Robinson that adds layers to his motives.
As more details unfold, skepticism regarding the investigation remains. Entin highlighted alternative theories positing the involvement of other individuals beyond Robinson, leaving the door open for further scrutiny in this case. The family member’s certainty about Robinson’s guilt raises the stakes, but it also invites close examination.
This incident, rife with emotional and social implications, reflects broader tensions surrounding identity and the complexities of violence. As this story continues to develop, it signals the potential for deeper discussions about the intersections of gender identity, societal expectations, and the patterns of violence that emerge in such volatile contexts.
"*" indicates required fields
