A federal civil rights lawsuit has emerged from allegations that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI abused their power against a citizen advocating for election integrity. Lawrence J. Ligas is suing the U.S. government for $39.7 million in a case he argues is marked by excessive force and retaliatory prosecution following his involvement in the January 6 events.
Filed on December 29, 2025, Ligas v. United States of America centers on claims of mistreatment during a pre-dawn FBI raid at his home. Ligas contends this raid was part of a broader attempt to silence voices challenging the official narrative surrounding January 6. Known for his grassroots work as an independent election expert, Ligas asserts he traveled to Washington, D.C. on that day as an observer, not a participant in any illegal activity. He insists he did not breach the Capitol or commit acts of violence.
Central to Ligas’ argument is the allegation that the DOJ sought to coerce him into making false statements against then-President Trump. Ligas states that pleas were offered that would have required him to align his testimony with the government’s portrayal of events, a demand he rejected. His civil case claims that the situation escalated into retaliatory charges, specifically a felony obstruction charge, after he refused to cooperate.
In the lawsuit, Ligas details the traumatic experience of the FBI raid on December 1, 2021. He describes waking to a violent intrusion when agents stormed his apartment, causing him injury as they forced their way in with guns drawn. This unnecessary show of force is at the heart of his civil rights claims, raising questions about the propriety of such aggressive tactics against a nonviolent citizen.
Ligas argues that this raid didn’t occur in isolation but was influenced by coordinated actions between federal agents and local political figures. He claims political operatives amplified narratives designed to tarnish his reputation, branding him unjustly as a dangerous figure tied to January 6. This effort included communications between the FBI and aides to Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, aimed at framing Ligas as part of a broader insurrectionist movement.
His lawsuit raises significant concerns about the politicization of law enforcement. Ligas emphasizes that he is an independent voter, not aligned with any political party’s agenda. His commitment to election integrity and transparency marks his motivation for involvement in the January 6 demonstrations, calling into question how the DOJ’s selective prosecution may serve to reinforce partisan narratives at the expense of independent citizens.
The careful detailing of Ligas’ experience illustrates a stark contrast to the government’s narrative. He maintains his innocence, asserting he did not act violently or unlawfully. Instead, Ligas describes himself as an observer who even attempted to de-escalate tensions among demonstrators. His perspective challenges the framing of January 6 as a simple insurrection and invites broader discourse on the nature of dissent in a politically charged environment.
As Ligas seeks accountability for what he terms the weaponization of law enforcement against him, he calls on journalists and legal professionals to examine the case closely. He emphasizes the potential danger of political narratives shaping law enforcement actions and the chilling effect this could have on independent advocates advocating for reform. “Standing up for accountability has cost me my reputation, my safety, and years of my life,” he stated, underscoring the personal toll of his ordeal.
In pursuing this lawsuit, Ligas is endeavoring not only for personal vindication but also to shed light on perceived injustices faced by independent citizens. His case raises fundamental questions about the balance between civil rights and government authority, particularly in contexts where political interests intersect. As the legal process unfolds, much will depend on the evidence and how it illuminates the interplay of justice, accountability, and political influence in contemporary America.
"*" indicates required fields
