Minneapolis Faces Economic Turmoil amid Protests Against ICE
Minneapolis is experiencing upheaval as left-leaning groups instigate numerous strikes against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). These protests have led to widespread labor walkouts and business closures, disrupting the local economy. The crisis has reached a boiling point, culminating in a statewide work stoppage last Friday, with plans for another strike looming on Monday.
The striking event, called “A Day of Truth and Freedom,” is the result of a coalition made up of labor unions, faith leaders, and activist organizations, including the Minnesota AFL-CIO and Indivisible Twin Cities. Their demands focus on expelling ICE from Minnesota and halting corporate collaborations with the agency. Organizers cite “unconstitutional” operations that generate concern and anxiety, particularly within immigrant communities.
The protests stem from a tragic incident on January 7, where an ICE agent shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Good in Minneapolis. ICE claims the shooting occurred during an operation to apprehend a fugitive. Local leaders argue this incident reflects a disturbing trend of aggressive enforcement tactics, especially under “Operation Metro Surge,” which has intensified scrutiny on ICE’s actions in the region.
A tweet captures the gravity of the situation: “Hotels, restaurants shutting down; this turmoil is NOT good for business.” This warning foreshadows economic ramifications should the strike continue, leading to concerns about the lasting impact on local commerce.
Consequently, numerous businesses—including popular co-ops and restaurants—kept their doors closed on Friday, choosing solidarity with protesters over sales. Reports suggest that around 80% of immigrant-owned businesses in the strike zones chose not to operate, leading to staggering reported losses of both inventory and sales.
Not only small businesses suffered; large corporations like Target also felt the brunt of the backlash. The Minneapolis-based retailer was embroiled in controversy after ICE arrested two U.S. citizen employees at its Richfield location. The lack of visible support from corporate leadership only fueled outrage among the public and critics alike. Kate Havelin from Indivisible Twin Cities remarked, “Two employees who were working at the Target in Richfield were arrested inside the store by ICE agents. Both young men were U.S. citizens, and Target officials did not intervene.” This incident compounded Target’s existing reputation issues around their diversity and inclusion policies.
The discontent has trickled down to Target’s workforce. Employees voiced their frustration in internal communications, expressing worry over corporate silence regarding the arrests. Target’s Chief Human Resources Officer, Melissa Kremer, acknowledged employee unrest, enhancing the sense of unease within the company.
In a separate display of discontent, more than 100 clergy and community leaders gathered at Target’s downtown Minneapolis location on January 15, demanding the corporation denounce ICE and fund Black institutions. Asad Zaman of the Muslim American Society highlighted serious concerns over public safety, referring to the recent shooting of Good, which exemplified the perceived dangers of ICE’s aggressive tactics.
Another major demonstration took place at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, where over 100 arrests occurred as demonstrators attempted to disrupt operations and voice their opposition to ICE’s actions. Protesters braved subzero temperatures to make their voices heard, demonstrating their commitment to the cause.
Protest organizers argue that their actions are a justified reaction to what they term the “occupation” of communities by federal immigration agents. According to Bernie Burnham, President of AFL-CIO Minnesota, “They are indiscriminately targeting Minnesotans of color, regardless of citizenship or immigration status,” instilling fear in everyday activities like attending work or sending children to school.
While the protests draw attention to pressing issues, the economic fallout raises alarm. Labor historian Professor Emily Twarog noted that while short-term strikes may not inflict severe financial damage, recurrent disruptions could harm public confidence and long-term worker morale. Companies like Target are already witnessing downward trends in earnings, labor shortages, and an unstable brand image as societal pressures mount.
Retail analyst Neil Saunders emphasized Target’s struggles, stating, “I think what Target didn’t do very well with the whole DEI situation was management of the situation and communication.” Such operational mismanagement has compounded dissatisfaction among consumers and contributed to declining in-store experiences.
The economic strain ripples through smaller businesses as well. Many such enterprises, often operating on tight margins, reported lost inventory due to spoiled goods amid shutdowns. With another potential strike pending, these business owners face a difficult decision: shut down once again at a time when financial stability is crucial or remain open and risk public backlash.
Calls for accountability from ICE and corporate entities persist, yet tangible solutions appear elusive. Organizers assert that protests will continue until they witness actual change. However, the damage to local economies and families caught in this contentious environment is evident and raises critical questions about the balance between activism and economic health.
As one local business owner reminded, “Closing down isn’t activism when your family needs to eat.”
"*" indicates required fields
