Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey’s call for peace marks a notable shift in his public approach amid growing tensions in the city. Just days after a fiery proclamation demanding that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) “get the f— out,” Frey appeared at a late news conference, navigating a delicate balance between advocating for calm and addressing rising chaos linked to immigration enforcement.
The catalyst for Frey’s change in tone was the shooting of an illegal immigrant from Venezuela. This incident unfolded dramatically, involving the individual allegedly ambushing a federal agent armed with a shovel. “I’m calling for peace,” Frey told reporters, underscoring the importance of collective effort to restore order in a fracturing environment. He acknowledged the critical roles that citizens and officials alike play in achieving this goal, indicating that peace is a shared responsibility in these divided times.
Frey’s comments reflect a broader conflict facing Minneapolis, compounded by his ongoing condemnation of ICE’s actions. He called for the agency to cease its operations in the city, framing the situation as unsustainable and impossible. “We’re in a position right now where we have residents that are asking the very limited number of police officers that we have to fight ICE agents on the street,” he noted, highlighting the surreal and troubling nature of local law enforcement needing to intervene in federal actions, and vice versa.
The mayor’s earlier remarks in the wake of the shooting painted a stark and aggressive picture. He admonished ICE directly, claiming their presence in Minneapolis was counterproductive to public safety. “Your stated reason for being in this city is to create some kind of safety, and you are doing exactly the opposite,” he asserted. This volatile language set the backdrop for Frey’s subsequent call for peace, leaving observers to question whether such a radical shift was genuine or a strategic retreat in response to the escalating unrest.
Frey’s insistence that he has not incited violence positions him defensively against charges of inflammatory rhetoric. “Show a single place where I have encouraged anything other than peace,” he challenged, attempting to dissociate himself from the escalating tensions in the streets. This defensive posture suggests a tension between his responsibilities as a mayor and the passionate reactions of both supporters and opponents of immigration policy.
Adding another layer to the turmoil, the Department of Homeland Security pointed to the agent’s decision to open fire as a response to the suspect’s aggressive actions. In stark contrast, President Donald Trump interjected with his own heated response, warning of the Insurrection Act’s potential invocation if local officials failed to manage the unrest. His threat brings a significant element of federal pressure upon local leadership.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s appeal to Trump, asking him to “turn the temperature down,” reflects the urgency felt by local leaders who are caught in the crossfire of national immigration policy debates. While Governor Walz seeks to defuse the situation, ICE’s response implies a hardline stance, urging the governor to support federal enforcement by honoring immigration detainers. “The buck stops with you, Governor,” they asserted, aiming to put the onus back on local leadership as tensions escalate.
Frey’s shift from aggressive indictment to a more tempered appeal for peace illustrates the complexity of navigating public safety in an environment fraught with competing interests. As protests continue under the weight of national policy controversy, the call for an end to violence surfaces amidst a backdrop of tension that seems far from resolution.
"*" indicates required fields
