George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley weighed in on a critical incident in Minneapolis involving an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent. The agent fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good after she allegedly obstructed an immigration enforcement operation and attempted to flee in her vehicle. Turley, speaking on “Fox & Friends,” noted that legal precedents might justify the agent’s decision to use deadly force.
According to Turley, the circumstances surrounding this case align with the legal standard set by the landmark Supreme Court case, Tennessee v. Garner. This 1985 ruling grants police officers the right to use deadly force against a fleeing suspect if they believe the individual poses an imminent threat to officers or the public. “The fact is that under the standard of Tennessee v. Garner, this does appear to be a justified shooting,” Turley stated. He added, “It doesn’t mean that’s how it’s going to work out. We need to see the ultimate conclusions of the investigation.” His insistence on further examination highlights the complexity of such cases, where immediate decisions must confront legal scrutiny.
Turley also emphasized the need for additional video evidence, acknowledging that what is currently available could influence the ultimate judgment on the shooting. He mentioned the expectations for civil lawsuits from Good’s family, suggesting that the legal repercussions could continue well beyond this immediate incident. “This is not the conduct of a legal observer. This is someone who is obstructing,” he observed, reflecting on Good’s actions during the immigration operation. This distinction between lawful observation and active participation plays a significant role in understanding the nuances of legal justification in use-of-force scenarios.
The context of violence against ICE agents adds another layer to this analysis. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reported that the Minneapolis incident is not isolated; the data show a dramatic rise in vehicular attacks against ICE agents. Between January 20, 2025, and November 2025, there were 28 attacks of this nature, marking a staggering increase of 1,300 percent. Noem described the situation as reaching intolerable levels, with overall assaults against ICE agents rising by 1,150 percent. This alarming trend suggests a growing volatility surrounding immigration enforcement and the potential dangers faced by agents on the job.
In stark contrast, Democratic Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota characterized the situation as a “war” between the state and federal government. This divisive statement underscores the broader conflict that often surrounds immigration enforcement in the United States. The clash of these narratives mirrors the complexity of opinion on immigration policies and the enforcement methods used to uphold them.
In summary, the Minneapolis shooting incident highlights critical legal and social discussions about law enforcement’s use of force under extreme circumstances. As investigations continue and public opinion remains divided, this situation exemplifies the fraught intersection of legal standards, personal conduct, and broader political narratives.
"*" indicates required fields
