The ongoing unrest in Minneapolis has prompted several Republican lawmakers to urge President Donald Trump not to invoke the Insurrection Act. This law, which allows for the deployment of active-duty military personnel to restore order, has not been used since the 1992 riots in Los Angeles, linked to the Rodney King verdict. The current calls for its use arise from demonstrations triggered by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) shooting of Renee Nicole Good.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune from South Dakota expressed skepticism about the necessity of such drastic measures. “Hopefully the local officials working with not only the federal law enforcement, ICE and other agencies, but also the local law enforcement officials will be able to settle things down,” Thune told reporters, indicating a belief in the capacity of local authorities to manage the situation without federal intervention.
Similarly, Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker from Mississippi raised questions regarding the appropriateness of invoking the Insurrection Act. He, along with Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, highlighted the need for caution in handling the unrest. Murkowski remarked, “Since the fatal shooting [of Good] a week or so ago that we needed to be very, very careful, very cautious in how we proceed… to keep the conflict, the potential for conflict as it relates to ICE enforcement dialed back.” She drew parallels to the protests following George Floyd’s death, emphasizing the already fragile climate and the potential for violence. “Everything was just so tenuous and so volatile. We don’t need that,” she added.
In a stark warning, Trump promised on Truth Social to activate the Insurrection Act if protests continued against ICE agents. He stated, “If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT.” Trump’s strong words signal the severity with which he views the situation, labeling the unrest a “travesty” in a state he claims was once great.
In contrast, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz called for calm, urging citizens to avoid violence. “Let’s turn the temperature down. Stop this campaign of retribution. This is not who we are,” Walz said. He emphasized the importance of peaceful expressions of dissent. His appeal for unity came in the wake of heated exchanges between state leadership and federal sources.
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson defended ICE and criticized Walz and other Democratic leaders in Minnesota. In her statement, she accused them of inciting violence against federal officers, suggesting that their rhetoric has played a role in escalating tensions. “…have done nothing but turn up the temperature, smear heroic ICE officers, and incite violence against them — all in defense of criminal illegal aliens,” she claimed, reinforcing a narrative that connects local leaders to the unrest while advocating for ICE’s enforcement role.
In this volatile political climate, the responses from both sides highlight a deeper divide regarding law enforcement and public safety. As tensions linger, the focus remains on the decisions made by lawmakers and the administration in navigating the complexities of local protests against federal enforcement actions. The stakes are high, and the necessity for healing as well as order continues to loom large over Minneapolis.
"*" indicates required fields
