New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has attracted significant criticism for his appeal to President Trump regarding the U.S. capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Despite Mamdani’s attempt to formally voice his objection, Trump acted swiftly, leading to Maduro’s arrival in New York to face serious legal charges on January 3, 2026.
The mayor’s objection came amidst public interest in Operation Absolute Resolve, which successfully captured Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, before they were charged with multiple offenses, including narco-terrorism and cocaine trafficking. Mamdani addressed reporters outside City Hall, stating, “I registered my opposition. I made it clear. We left it at that.” His declaration became a target for ridicule online, with one tweet encapsulating the reaction: “Communist Mayor Zohran Mamdani says he called President Trump to file a complaint about his arrest of Maduro… President Trump TOTALLY disregarded Mamdani’s opinion.”
Mamdani’s stance reflects his identity as a democratic socialist linked to far-left groups. His criticism of U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding the arrest of a dictator, has drawn strong backlash given the broad bipartisan support for the military operation. While some Democrats questioned the operation’s legality, key law enforcement and intelligence officials underscored the serious charges against Maduro.
Operation Absolute Resolve commenced promptly, with Trump authorizing the military action late on January 2. A task force, including Army Delta Force operatives and extensive air support, executed the mission against Maduro’s Caracas compound. Within hours, the operation led to Maduro’s capture aboard the USS Iwo Jima and his eventual transport to New York.
General Dan Caine from the Joint Chiefs of Staff detailed how air superiority and precise intelligence contributed to the mission’s success. Caine stated, “We took deliberate steps to avoid civilian casualties and ensure the safe capture of both primary targets.” Such assertions bolster the operation’s effectiveness in achieving its goals without significant collateral damage.
The legal justification for this military operation stems from existing indictments under public statutes, notably the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act. Attorney General Pam Bondi remarked on the severity of the charges, linking Maduro and his conspirators to the trafficking of over 250 metric tons of cocaine. “This is about enforcing U.S. law and protecting U.S. lives,” she asserted during a press briefing, emphasizing the determination of the Department of Justice to pursue criminals of this nature.
Mamdani’s opposition appears more ideologically driven rather than grounded in any missteps by the U.S. legal framework. His past support for socialist policies raises questions about the sincerity of his objections to Maduro’s detention. Furthermore, the timing of his call to Trump was rather futile, given that the military operation was already in progress.
International reactions to the event were split. Countries like Russia, China, and Iran condemned the U.S. actions, branding them as unlawful. Conversely, France and the U.K. expressed cautious approval, focusing on the humanitarian aspects for Venezuelans. Notably, Israel openly supported the operation, framing it as part of broader efforts to counter Iranian influence in the region.
Back in Venezuela, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez labeled the capture a “foreign coup” and demanded evidence of Maduro and Flores’s safety. Yet many Venezuelans in exile celebrated their removal from power, viewing it as a long-awaited step toward liberation from authoritarian rule.
Domestically, Mamdani’s comments have raised concerns about his representation of New Yorkers’ interests, particularly in the context of drug trafficking linked to Maduro’s regime. One local official commented, “There’s nothing brave or righteous about defending a cartel-linked dictator.” This sentiment reinforces the idea that Mamdani’s intervention lacks the necessary grounding in community safety and well-being.
This incident also sparks a broader dialogue about the role mayors play in federal foreign policy issues. While local leaders are free to express their views, their positions gain relevance when they align with community interests or humanitarian concerns. Mamdani’s remarks, however, seem to diverge from the bipartisan agreement forming around Maduro’s prosecution.
Supporters of the operation highlight critical metrics reflecting the capture’s importance. U.S. intelligence associates the Venezuelan government’s trafficking network with a significant percentage of cocaine entering the U.S. from the Caribbean, revealing the scope of the threat posed. The DEA reports that the Cartel de los Soles exported vast quantities of cocaine, funding their operations through state-owned oil revenue.
As Mamdani faces public scrutiny, Maduro and Flores remain in federal custody, awaiting arraignment. Their son, Nicolás Maduro Guerra, is also under indictment but remains elusive, believed to be in Cuba or Nicaragua.
On social media, Mamdani’s call has become a source of widespread ridicule. The mockery highlights the perceived impotence of his stance, with particular emphasis on the timing and context of his complaint. As the fallout continues, Mamdani is left to reflect on his position. When asked during a follow-up event whether he felt his call had any influence, he replied, “I did what I believed was right.” The public’s reception of that belief remains uncertain.
"*" indicates required fields
