A recent council meeting in Old Bridge Township, New Jersey, became a battleground over the role of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the controversies surrounding protests against the agency. Councilwoman Anita Greenberg-Belli stood firm, defending ICE’s mission amidst heated debate and divisive rhetoric. Her remarks struck at the core of a contentious issue that echoes far beyond local politics.
Greenberg-Belli’s statements came during a gathering on January 27, where residents expressed their concerns about immigration enforcement and the conduct of local police in relation to federal authorities. “We have to recognize that ICE is not the problem,” she asserted, emphasizing that the agency is trying to ensure safety in communities. This direct statement reflects a belief that ICE, often maligned in public discourse, is performing a necessary function — one that serves the public interest rather than undermines it.
The councilwoman argued passionately that any isolation of ICE from local police creates dangerous situations, where arrests must occur within neighborhoods rather than in controlled environments. She explained that “when local police are told they cannot work with ICE… that is where all this is breaking down.” Her insight highlights a pragmatic concern — that local officers, unable to collaborate with federal agents, may unwittingly exacerbate risks to public safety.
In her defense of ICE, Greenberg-Belli also took aim at the extremes of public protest. She detailed how some demonstrations transition from peaceful advocacy into disruptive actions. By stating, “disruption is another thing,” she delineated between the rights to protest and the responsibility to maintain order, indicating that public safety should not be compromised by civil dissent.
At the heart of her critique was the comparison of ICE to Nazis, which she condemned as offensive and misleading. “When you use that word and call these people Nazis and fascists, it just shows your ignorance,” she said, urging protesters to reconsider their language. This poignant observation underscores the harm that can arise when historical atrocities are trivialized by inappropriate analogies. Greenberg-Belli insisted this rhetoric undermines meaningful discourse and distracts from the real issue — which, according to her, is ensuring community safety and security.
The councilwoman provided historical context, contrasting the enforcement of immigration laws with the systemic persecution that Jews faced during the Holocaust. She noted that while the latter resulted in unprecedented violence and loss of rights, individuals now facing immigration enforcement still retain legal channels for recourse. Her call for accuracy in language and understanding of history invokes a sense of responsibility among public officials and citizens alike.
Greenberg-Belli’s comments also touched upon the broader implications of illegal immigration. She voiced concerns about the financial burdens it places on communities, including issues of fraud and threats to election integrity. With national repercussions in mind, she stated, “this has happened, and it’s got to stop.” This sentiment speaks to a widespread anxiety about the potential consequences of unchecked immigration on local resources and safety.
In closing her remarks, Greenberg-Belli reiterated a commitment to protect lives, regardless of the complexities surrounding immigration. “You can’t go around calling people that are doing their job — that work for the federal government, the state or local government — Nazis,” she said firmly. The councilwoman’s defense of ICE encapsulates a deep-seated conviction that constructive dialogue and respectful discourse are essential in addressing contentious issues such as immigration enforcement.
The council meeting highlighted the fractures in public opinion regarding immigration, law enforcement, and protest culture. Greenberg-Belli’s unwavering stance invites a reflection on the importance of collaboration between local and federal law enforcement in fostering safe communities while navigating the polarizing nature of immigration debates.
"*" indicates required fields
