Recent developments involving Paul Brown, the FBI Special Agent in Charge at the Atlanta Field Office, have raised questions about the agency’s response to alleged election irregularities in Fulton County. Reports indicate Brown was “forced out” earlier this month, with sources attributing his departure to his initial inquiries regarding the Justice Department’s renewed investigations into the 2020 election. Ken Dilanian from MSNOW claims that Brown expressed “concern” over what he termed “unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud.”
However, The Gateway Pundit presents a different narrative. They published a comprehensive 26-count report claiming extensive maladministration and evidence destruction in Fulton County related to the 2020 election. This report reportedly includes references and corroborating materials meant to validate the claims, directly contradicting Dilanian’s label of the allegations as “unsubstantiated.” According to The Gateway Pundit, the report was shared with the Department of Justice, suggesting serious concerns regarding election integrity.
Included in this discourse is a letter purportedly from Brown himself, sent to Fulton County Elections Director Nadine Williams, which sought the voluntary production of vital election materials from 2020. These include paper ballots, ballot envelopes, and various tabulator records. This approach, rather than pursuing a more aggressive path like a probable cause search warrant, has been criticized by sources who see it as a sign of indecisiveness in addressing the issues at hand.
Notably, the letter contained several typographical errors, suggesting a lack of thoroughness. It misspelled “tallie” instead of “tally” and failed to include a compliance deadline for Williams. These issues, combined with the absence of a clear date of origin, have fueled skepticism regarding the seriousness of the FBI’s inquiry into Fulton County.
The backdrop of this turmoil is a series of prior attempts over several years to access election-related records. These efforts range from requests made by political figures to subpoenas issued by the Georgia State Election Board linked to ongoing investigations. One particular case regarding access to physical ballots has languished in the courts for over 1,100 days, highlighting a significant delay in resolving these election integrity matters.
In contrast to the controversy surrounding Brown’s departure, sources have pointed out that the FBI has acted “diligently and professionally” in its investigation since his ouster. This claim appears to come in a context where frustrations run high regarding how Brown managed responses to the aforementioned 26-count report.
One commentator remarked, “THE FBI SAC TRIED TO SLOW WALK THIS,” reflecting what many see as an inadequate approach to the significant findings documented in The Gateway Pundit report. The sentiment on social media indicates a collective frustration with what many perceive as a bureaucratic reluctance to tackle perceived discrepancies in the electoral process.
As this narrative develops, the implications of Brown’s departure and the subsequent handling of election-related investigations could indicate a broader trend within the FBI and the Justice Department as they navigate the contentious waters of election integrity and transparency. With allegations of evidence destruction and improper administration hanging in the balance, pressure mounts for the agencies involved to provide clarity and accountability regarding the events of 2020.
"*" indicates required fields
