Recent events at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, spotlight a troubling trend where places of worship are becoming targets of politically charged protests. On that Sunday morning, worshippers found their sacred space disrupted by the chaotic entrance of activist William Scott Kelly, known on social media as “DaWokeFarmer.” Accompanied by fellow activist Nekima Levy Armstrong, Kelly’s protest against Pastor David Easterwood and accusations of complicity with Immigration and Customs Enforcement were marked by loud shouts of “ICE out!” and harsh insults directed at congregants.
Witnesses reported a scene that turned families’ peaceful worship into a nightmare. One congregant described how Kelly yelled at his wife and children with vulgar epithets, leaving worshippers shaken, especially the children present. The inflammatory language and aggressive demeanor of the protestors raised significant concerns about the safety and sanctity of religious gatherings.
The reach of Kelly’s activism extends beyond Minnesota. In Washington, D.C., he’s alleged to have harassed worshippers at Christ Church, where notable political figures are known to attend. His confrontational tactics included using bullhorns to shout profanities and following members out to their vehicles, prompting fears for their safety. Associate Pastor Joe Rigney noted that congregants felt threatened as they attempted to leave the church.
Despite being arrested by the U.S. Secret Service earlier for similar behavior, Kelly’s activities continue, raising questions about the effectiveness of law enforcement once again. His financial support for these protests, primarily sourced from GoFundMe contributions, suggests a larger movement behind him, further complicating the narrative surrounding his actions.
In the aftermath of the disruption, Kelly sought to position himself as a victim, claiming on social media that he fears facing criminal charges. His rhetoric shifts from defiance to desperation when he implores authority figures to arrest him. This self-presentation appalls many, especially in light of the intimidation tactics he employed against vulnerable churchgoers.
Responses from legal authorities have been swift. Attorney General Pam Bondi emphasized that attacks against law enforcement and intimidation of religious groups will not be tolerated, stating that such actions are met with “the full force of federal law.” Echoing this sentiment, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon asserted the legal protections churches enjoy against such disruptions, highlighting the serious implications of Kelly’s actions and their potential violation of federal statutes regarding religious assembly.
The involvement of former CNN anchor Don Lemon during this disruption adds another layer to the controversy. His attempts to document the chaotic scene received backlash, and Dhillon’s condemnation of his actions underscores a growing unease over the intersection of media, protest, and religious sanctity.
While Kelly claims his demonstrations serve to expose collusion and systemic injustices, critics argue that they cross the threshold from protest to outright harassment. Complaints have been filed with police, yet tangible accountability remains elusive. The situation raises important questions regarding the balance between free speech and the right to peaceful worship, particularly when the safety of congregants is at stake.
Kelly’s approach, characterized by coordinated and aggressive tactics, highlights a disturbing trend of targeting religious spaces in the name of political activism. The aftermath of high-profile incidents, like the deadly encounter involving an ICE officer, has prompted a surge in protests, connecting faith communities to broader grievances against law enforcement. However, for many, this shift threatens the very essence of worship—offering a place for refuge rather than a battleground for political discourse.
The unsettling dynamics surrounding these protests are evident to congregants, who express a deep concern for their right to worship in peace. One church member encapsulated this fear by stating, “We’re being stalked at our house of worship.” His words underscore the serious ramifications of allowing political activism to intrude into sacred spaces.
As investigations continue, it remains to be seen whether Kelly will face charges that reflect the severity of his actions. Law enforcement has responded by increasing security measures around churches, indicating a recognition of the potential threats posed by such protests. With parents now ensuring their children are escorted in groups to and from services, the once peaceful act of attending church has been transformed into an experience colored by anxiety and vigilance.
The actions at Cities Church and elsewhere illustrate a crossroads—where civic expression challenges the fundamental rights to peaceful assembly and religious practice. As voices from the legal community and government assert that harassment under the guise of protest will face severe consequences, the landscape of civil discourse regarding faith and rights is altered irreversibly. More than ever, the sanctity of worship stands at risk as political divisions deepen and manifest in unexpected and distressing ways.
"*" indicates required fields
