On January 19, a “racial justice” group stormed the evangelical Cities Church in Minnesota, disrupting a sermon and demanding justice for Renee Good. Organizer Nekima Levy Armstrong led the group in chants like “Hands up, don’t shoot,” drawing attention to their cause but also raising serious questions about appropriate protest methods. Their action lasted roughly 45 minutes before law enforcement arrived, yet mainstream media outlets downplayed the incident. The silence from major networks like ABC, CBS, and NBC is telling.
While these networks typically ramp up coverage when protests occur, their responses in this instance were minimal. For instance, ABC allotted merely 51 seconds to cover the protest across their early news cycles, while CBS managed only 14 seconds. Such a stark difference in coverage raises eyebrows, especially when considering the outrage that would likely ensue if the roles were reversed. Wouldn’t a similar disruption at an abortion clinic or a mosque elicit swift condemnation? This inconsistency highlights the selective attention given to certain narratives in the media.
Maggie Vespa from NBC did offer a platform for Armstrong to voice her grievances, stating, “They need to be investigating Jonathan Ross for the killing of Renee Good.” However, this raises further questions. Was the church invasion a peaceful demonstration, as Armstrong claimed—especially when it effectively ended a religious service? Notably, the media’s framing often merged this incident with broader “growing tensions” rather than confronting the implications of interfering with a sacred gathering.
PBS and NPR were also reluctant to provide substantial coverage. NPR’s brief mentions came in the form of focus groups talking about the aggressive stance of ICE rather than a thorough examination of the disruption itself. When the Justice Department indicted Armstrong, the lack of focus on this significant development further exemplified the media’s indifference toward the violation of laws protecting places of worship.
As news outlets discussed the ongoing tensions around racial issues, they seemingly glossed over the implications of interrupting a worship service. It raises a poignant question: what defines decorum in protest? The church, as a “sacred space,” surely deserves respect, a nuance recognized even by St. Paul’s Mayor, who remarked that such protests were inappropriate in these settings.
To add to the complexity, former CNN host Don Lemon was present during the protest, appearing to abandon journalistic integrity for click-driven sensationalism. His remarks downplaying misdemeanors prompted ridicule rather than serious discourse. This reaction reveals a troubling trend where media elites prioritize viral content over substantive journalism. By promoting divisive narratives while neglecting the outcry surrounding the invasion, they minimize the implications for American society.
Ultimately, the media’s avoidance of the church disruption story contributes to a skewed portrayal of protest dynamics in America. The inconsistent coverage suggests a prioritization of specific narratives that align with broader political leanings rather than a commitment to journalistic integrity. Acknowledging this protest’s consequences requires more than mere snippets of coverage. It demands an honest conversation about the boundaries of activism in sacred spaces.
"*" indicates required fields
