Zohran Mamdani’s decision to appoint Ramzi Kassem as New York City’s chief legal counsel has ignited significant controversy. Kassem, a law professor at the City University of New York, comes with a polarizing history that raises serious questions about his suitability for the role. His past involvement in defending an al-Qaeda terrorist and radical activists serves as a glaring spotlight on the new administration’s direction.
Mamdani expressed confidence in Kassem’s ability, proclaiming, “I am delighted to announce that I am naming Ramzi Kassem as Chief Counsel. Ramzi will be joining the administration from CUNY, where he serves as a professor of law.” He acknowledged Kassem’s experience as a senior policy advisor under President Biden and emphasized his commitment to those often overlooked by the legal system. This appointment, however, quickly met with backlash.
Critics are vocal about Kassem’s past. His defense of Ahmed al-Darbi, who was involved in a terrorist plot resulting in civilian casualties, is particularly noteworthy. In 2014, al-Darbi pleaded guilty to conspiracy connected to an al-Qaeda plot to bomb a French oil tanker, a tragic event that left one person dead and others injured. Kassem expressed hope for al-Darbi’s repatriation, reflecting a larger pattern of activism that some argue prioritizes legal rights over public safety.
Assemblyman Kalman Yeger articulated concern over Kassem’s appointment, stating, “In a city as great as New York, there are any number of brilliant legal minds willing and able to serve who have not previously defended terrorists as an Al Qaeda lawyer.” He implies that the choice sends a message to extremists that their presence is not only tolerated but welcomed in the highest echelons of city governance.
The political ramifications of this appointment are extensive. Councilwoman Vickie Paladino criticized the decision, highlighting the gravity of bringing someone with Kassem’s background into such a significant position just years after the September 11 attacks. She noted the irony in Kassem’s immigration to the United States post-9/11 to defend terrorists, framing it as a monumental failure of the immigration system. Her comments reflect a broader sentiment of fear and frustration among those who prioritize national security.
Kassem’s role as chief counsel will oversee various city functions and provide legal guidance to the administration. His leadership in the Creating Law Enforcement Accountability & Responsibility (CLEAR) law clinic indicates a commitment to advocating for marginalized communities but raises further questions about his stance on national security and counterterrorism. With a mission aimed at supporting those targeted by government actions, Kassem’s priorities may starkly contrast with the interests of a city still healing from past traumas.
Mamdani’s administration is poised to face significant scrutiny as it begins its tenure. Critics will likely remain vigilant over Kassem’s legal decisions and their impact on public safety. As many parts of the nation reflect on their legal systems in light of past injustices, this appointment will serve as a barometer for Mamdani’s effectiveness as mayor in addressing both community needs and safety concerns.
As January 1, 2026, approaches, Kassem’s appointment will influence not only the legal culture within New York City but also set the tone for Mamdani’s term. The implications resonate beyond legal criteria; they tap into the very fabric of community trust and safety. Those skeptical of this radical shift in leadership will continue to voice their concerns, while supporters will advocate for the change they believe is necessary for a more equitable society.
"*" indicates required fields
