Actor Rob Schneider did not hold back when discussing Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey on the recent episode of the “PBD Podcast.” Schneider condemned Frey’s comments following the tragic shooting of a woman by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent, describing the mayor as a “lunatic” and a “disgrace.” The incident took place during an operation where the woman accelerated her vehicle as agents approached.
Frey had responded passionately, demanding that ICE “get the f*ck out of Minneapolis.” Schneider viewed this outburst as political theater, arguing it prioritized drama over safety. “That guy [Frey] is a lunatic,” Schneider said, accusing the mayor and others like him of allowing their cities to deteriorate. He added, “They would rather have it overrun by people who are not citizens.” To Schneider, Frey’s actions are emblematic of a larger failure to protect residents.
This kind of rhetoric is not isolated. It coincides with rising tensions across several American cities where protests erupted in response to the shooting. Schneider emphasized that Frey, rather than calming the situation, is inflaming it. “He’s using this as a time to drum things up,” Schneider stated, portraying Frey as someone engaged in a political battle rather than genuinely seeking to serve the public.
In response to the unrest, Frey stated that Minneapolis residents stand “in one accord” to support the immigrant community and maintain safety. He dismissed the notion that the protests resembled the unrest of 2020, suggesting instead that the demonstrators were cautious not to react impulsively and fall into traps set by the federal agency. His comments suggest a desire to frame the narrative around these protests as not only justified but also disciplined.
However, tensions persist, and opinions about the role of political discourse in shaping public perception of ICE and law enforcement are surfacing. Democratic strategist Julian Epstein weighed in on the situation, linking heated comments from elected officials to unrest and violence. He noted the implications of incendiary terms like “Gestapo” and “occupying force,” asserting they contribute to a climate in which confrontations can escalate dangerously.
Epstein’s remarks underscore the complexity of the dialogue around immigration enforcement and law enforcement in America. The invocation of extreme language creates a ripple effect that sharpens divides and inflates tensions. In such a politically charged atmosphere, the line between lawful protest and chaos can blur, further complicating the already fraught relationship between communities and the agencies tasked with enforcing immigration laws.
As protests unfold in Minneapolis and beyond, the discourse around ICE and its operations will undoubtedly continue to evoke strong reactions. Schneider’s condemnation of Frey reflects a broader frustration among many who feel that political leaders should prioritize the safety of their citizens. It raises a critical question about accountability and leadership when navigating incidents that trigger public outcry.
"*" indicates required fields
