President Donald Trump’s recent quip about renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of Trump” at a rally has ignited both laughter and criticism. “Gulf of Trump DOES have a good ring! Maybe we COULD do that,” he suggested, striking a chord with his supporters. However, it also stirred a broader and more contentious issue: the effort to officially rename the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America.” This push originated from Executive Order 14172, which Trump signed on January 20, marking his first day back in office.
Despite later clarifying that his comment was meant in jest, it reignited a significant conversation around geographic naming rights, implicating various stakeholders from Congress and federal courts to media organizations and foreign governments. The impact of his playful comment was evident; humor intertwined with a serious topic can shape public dialogue and perception.
The executive order he issued, titled “Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness,” instructed all federal agencies to switch from “Gulf of Mexico” to “Gulf of America” in official documents and maps. The Department of the Interior took immediate action, implementing this directive through Secretarial Order 3423 within weeks, thereby updating the U.S. Board on Geographic Names database.
At the rally, Trump remarked, “We took the Gulf of Mexico, and now it’s the Gulf of America. I was gonna call it the Gulf of Trump, but I thought I’d be killed if I did that!” His remarks were met with cheers, but the fallout from this policy shift was already becoming evident. Polls from early February indicated that a substantial majority—over 70%—opposed the renaming. Such data demonstrates hesitancy within the public sphere regarding not only this specific change but also the broader implications of altering names steeped in tradition.
Procedurally, the shift was executed with remarkable speed. Federal agencies implemented the new name on January 24, and by February 9, the White House had proclaimed the first “Gulf of America Day,” using digital platforms to promote it. Legislation supporting the name change, House Bill 276, passed the U.S. House of Representatives, although its fate in the Senate remains uncertain.
Reactions outside the federal realm varied considerably. While Google Maps and Apple Maps reflected the renaming after government pressure, platforms like Bing Maps and MapQuest opted not to comply, citing confusion over international naming conventions. These discrepancies highlight the complexities of enforcing names that cut across borders and cultures.
In an assertive move, the Associated Press (AP) declined to use the term “Gulf of America.” The response from the White House was swift: access to the Oval Office and Air Force One was revoked for AP journalists in March. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt justified this action, saying, “If we feel there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable.” However, the AP pushed back, having received a temporary injunction from a federal judge that restored their press access and underscored First Amendment concerns.
This clash over naming conventions even spilled into the international arena. Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum ridiculed the name change and suggested that North America could be referred to as “Mexican America.” Her remarks brought forward a formal complaint from Mexico regarding the Gulf’s new designation on U.S. maps. The United Nations principles prohibiting unilateral renaming of geographical features deepen this international legal pressure, underscoring the complicated relationship between national identity and geographic designation.
The Trump administration framed this renaming initiative as part of a broader strategy to reinforce American heritage. Other aspects of his executive order included switching Alaska’s tallest mountain back to “Mount McKinley” from “Denali.” Trump defended these changes as essential for teaching future generations about American heroes rather than foreign or indigenous terms. However, this maneuvering drew criticism, particularly from Alaska Native groups, who view the name “Denali” as a connection to their history and culture.
Practical repercussions arose almost immediately. Internal documents for a Trump-branded mobile phone service were found to still display “Gulf of Mexico,” an oversight that fueled accusations of inconsistency. The application was updated quietly, but not before screenshots circulated among detractors.
The legislative landscape reflects a deepening rift on these issues. Proposed bills in Congress show stark divisions, with Senate Democrats looking to retain the name “Denali” while Republicans push to solidify “Gulf of America” as law. As of June, neither side had achieved a decisive victory in Congress.
For Trump, the intersection of humor and policy is more than a mere joke; it’s a branding strategy that leaves a mark on American narrative. The “Gulf of Trump” quip, though playful, hints at a larger thematic concern of how names influence identity and the historical record. The name-changing pursuit embodies Trump’s ongoing endeavor to reshape institutions and perceptions within America, though whether the public and world will embrace these changes remains uncertain.
As Trump reflected, “I’m joking, you know, when I say that. I was not gonna call it the Gulf of Trump,” the line illustrates a powerful truth about his presidency: the influence of language, even in jest, can redefine the cultural landscape, leaving people to ponder the meanings behind the names they know—or wish to replace.
"*" indicates required fields
