Republican lawmakers are calling on President Donald Trump to use the Insurrection Act against Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz. The request follows Walz’s remarks about possibly deploying the National Guard in response to federal immigration enforcement actions within his state.
Rep. Mary Miller from Illinois was unambiguous in her demand, urging Trump via a post on X, “Invoke the Insurrection Act. Arrest Tim Walz.” This message underscores the tension between state and federal authority surrounding immigration enforcement in Minnesota, particularly after a tragic shooting involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
At a press event, Governor Walz stated, “We do not need any further help from the federal government.” His declaration followed a chilling incident in Minneapolis where Renee Nicole Good was shot by law enforcement as she confronted ICE agents from her vehicle. It was a moment that heightened the stakes in an already contentious discussion. Walz’s statement reflects a growing frustration with federal immigration policies, which he perceives as overreaching.
He added, “I’ve issued a warning order to prepare the Minnesota National Guard.” This heads-up signals a readiness to act if the situation escalates, drawing a clear line between state defenses and federal mandates. Despite Minnesota law permitting Walz to deploy the National Guard for various duties—including law enforcement—his comments have ignited fierce backlash from Republican officials.
Others in the GOP echoed Miller’s sentiments. Rep. Nancy Mace from South Carolina responded sharply, stating, “Someone remind him: Donald Trump is the Commander in Chief.” Mace pointed to the Constitution, emphasizing that federal authority “supersedes state authority.” It’s a fundamental principle of governance that drives her point home: states cannot establish themselves above federal law.
Mace continued, labeling Walz’s threats as insurrection and urging the president to act, stating, “What Walz is threatening has a name: insurrection. Mr. President, the law is on your side. Use it.” Such strong rhetoric not only illustrates the Republicans’ position but also raises questions about the delicate balance of power between state and federal jurisdictions.
Walz’s office has not commented on these assertions. However, his prior statements indicate he stands firm against what he sees as unjust federal interventions in state affairs. The dynamics between his administration and the Trump administration represent more than a mere disagreement; they highlight significant ideological divisions regarding governance and law enforcement.
As tensions rise over immigration enforcement in Minnesota, the unfolding drama between state and federal authority continues to draw sharp lines. Walz’s posture of deploying the National Guard clashes with Republican calls for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act, a situation that many view as an unnerving standoff between state rights and federal power. The political implications of these statements will likely resonate well beyond Minnesota, as both sides brace for potential escalation.
"*" indicates required fields
