In a recent press Q&A, President Donald Trump made headlines with a sharp retort regarding Amazon’s significant $40 million investment in the documentary Melania. When questioned about the company’s hefty purchase, he dismissed criticism by challenging detractors to ask former President Barack Obama, who he claimed made a large sum without contributing much. “Go and ask President Obama who got paid a lot of money and hasn’t done ANYTHING! Melania really produced!” Trump’s remark quickly captured public attention.
This statement reflects Trump’s ongoing strategy of positioning his family’s post-White House entrepreneurial ventures as distinct from those of the Obamas. Both families have ventured into the media landscape, jockeying for visibility through lucrative deals in streaming and publishing. This comparison is only amplified with the impending release of Melania, directed by Brett Ratner, which promises an inside look at the First Lady during the crucial weeks leading to the 2025 inauguration.
Amazon’s steep financial commitment, reported at $40 million to distribute the documentary, is significant. The company has also invested an additional $35 million in promotional expenses, making the total investment around $75 million. This staggering figure places Melania among the most lavish documentary projects to date, without declaring ties to music or event rights, which typically inflate costs.
This considerable spending has not escaped scrutiny. According to reports, several employees of Amazon MGM Studios expressed concerns, noting they felt obligated to work on the film despite their personal political beliefs. A New York Times report cited sources within the studio who revealed the project was imposed from above, with potential termination on the table for any who refused to participate.
Industry expert Ted Hope raised questions about the motivations behind Amazon’s financing. “This has to be the most expensive documentary ever made that didn’t involve music licensing… How can it not be equated with currying favor or an outright bribe?” he stated, highlighting the financial risks associated with such a hefty investment.
In defending the project, Amazon released a statement asserting their belief in the documentary’s appeal to customers. Insiders have suggested that the film’s potential to draw a global audience and boost Melania Trump’s memoir sales was a driving force behind the acquisition.
Trump’s comparisons to the Obamas are not without merit. The Obamas secured a multi-million-dollar production deal with Netflix in 2018, leading to the critically acclaimed documentary American Factory and best-selling memoirs. In stark contrast, Melania Trump’s documentary is set for a theatrical release in 21 cities across the globe. Its rollout commenced with a splashy premiere at the Trump-Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., and an Amazon Prime Video release anticipated for late 2025. The documentary’s debut coincides with her memoir’s discounted launch, greatly improving its position in political biography rankings.
Despite Trump’s declarations of the film’s quality, industry predictions caution against expecting strong financial performance. Estimates for Melania’s opening weekend earnings range from $2 to $5 million, a figure that lags significantly behind the threshold needed to recoup the investment. Analysts suggest that to break even, the documentary would need to earn upwards of $150 million globally.
Insiders have noted that Amazon’s motivations may extend beyond profit. High-profile executives from Amazon, including CEO Andy Jassy, attended early screenings, alongside influential figures like Apple CEO Tim Cook and former boxing champion Mike Tyson. This eclectic guest list raises eyebrows regarding the documentary’s implications for corporate and political relationships.
The timing of this deal is noteworthy, coinciding with efforts by major corporate leaders to mend ties with Trump ahead of his potential 2024 re-election campaign. Reports have already surfaced about substantial donations from companies eager to curry favor with the incoming administration. Notably, Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s founder, has made a $1 million contribution to Trump’s inaugural fund, signaling a shift from previous public clashes.
Melania Trump’s role as an executive producer on the film adds depth to its narrative. She has articulated her need for editorial control, reflecting her selective approach to public engagement. “I’m a very private person and a very selective person—what I do, what I don’t do, when I talk, when I don’t talk. And that’s my choice, and nobody is in charge of me,” she stated in a recent interview, emphasizing her autonomy in the filmmaking process.
The documentary itself is characterized by personal moments, including behind-the-scenes glimpses of her life during the White House transition, which she curated with care. Critics contend, however, that while the Obamas’ media endeavors focused on policy themes, Melania is closely tied to contributions from the Trumps’ return to politics, casting the large financial outlay as strategically advantageous rather than simply a media investment.
Further complicating matters, reports indicate that South African theater chains have withdrawn Melania from their listings following tensions about U.S. diplomatic statements, raising the specter of the documentary being intertwined with larger political forces.
As Melania prepares for its theatrical premiere, the underlying political context intensifies. Amazon’s investment transcends the documentary itself, hinting at the broader alignment of media interests in the event of a second Trump term. For Trump, framing his wife’s film as a compelling success juxtaposed against Obama-era projects serves both as a defense and a pointed remark: “Melania really produced.”
"*" indicates required fields
