President Donald Trump is preparing to grant a full pardon to former Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vázquez Garced, along with her co-defendants Julio Martín Herrera-Velutini and Mark Rossini, a former FBI agent. This decision follows Vázquez’s endorsement of Trump in 2020, during which she referred to him as the leader who delivers for her island. She has actively encouraged Puerto Ricans across the United States, particularly in New York and Florida, to support Trump.
The White House has confirmed the impending pardon, highlighting that the prosecution of Vázquez lacked any verifiable quid pro quo and was politically driven. A White House official stated, “This entire case is an example of political prosecution.” These remarks suggest that her legal troubles are seen as more than just a legal issue; they are framed as part of a broader narrative about the politicization of justice.
Vázquez was arrested in 2022 under allegations of bribery tied to her gubernatorial campaign. Despite the serious nature of these charges, her pardon materials vigorously defend her actions, asserting that there was no bribery scheme… but rather standard policy discussions with potential donors. This defense aligns with a growing sentiment among Trump allies that political motivations are often behind such prosecutions.
The White House noted that the investigation into Vázquez’s conduct began shortly after she publicly supported Trump, further suggesting that her prosecution might have originated from political fallout rather than legitimate legal concerns. Such insights resonate with individuals who express skepticism toward the justice system and its perceived biases against political figures who align with Trump.
This case is not isolated. The White House has drawn parallels between Vázquez’s situation and that of Alexander Sittenfeld, who received a presidential pardon in 2025 after experiencing what was characterized as a similarly questionable corruption investigation. The notion of a two-tiered justice system, in which certain politicians face politically motivated scrutiny, underpins the rationale for pursuing pardons in these cases.
Trump’s historical record concerning pardons reflects a willingness to overturn convictions that are seen as unjust or politically charged. In 2025 alone, he issued a series of high-profile pardons, extending clemency to individuals including January 6 defendants, former Congress member George Santos, and various business and political figures. This trend indicates an ongoing commitment by Trump to support those he considers victims of political persecution.
As the situation unfolds, the announcement regarding Vázquez’s pardon underscores the complex interplay of politics and justice in the current American landscape. It renews discussions about the fairness of judicial processes and the responsibility of the justice system to operate without bias or influence from political affiliations.
In this context, the pardon may serve as a rallying point for Trump’s supporters, affirming their belief in his role as a champion for those they view as unfairly targeted by the legal system. The implications of this case could resonate far beyond Puerto Rico, intertwining with broader national conversations about governance, accountability, and the rule of law.
"*" indicates required fields
