Former President Donald Trump has ignited a heated conversation about the role of tariffs in addressing America’s fiscal challenges. In a recent statement, he highlighted significant “unaccounted revenue” from tariffs, claiming surpluses approaching $39 billion. Trump’s lively recounting of the moment he learned about this unexpected financial boost showcases his signature storytelling style. “Sir, we’re off by $39 billion,” he recalled. This dramatic revelation has intensified the debate on whether tariffs could be a viable solution for the country’s financial strains or if they pose hidden risks to families and small businesses.
The current economic landscape shows a remarkable shift in tariff revenue. Data from the U.S. Treasury indicates that customs and excise revenues are projected to reach approximately $98 billion for fiscal year 2024. This monthly revenue has surged, with a single month reporting over $29 billion. Such figures suggest that total tariff revenue could exceed $300 billion in 2025 if trends continue. Trump’s claims about $650 billion likely encompass cumulative revenue over time, spanning both his presidency and his ongoing influence in public policy.
Historically, tariffs have accounted for a minor fraction of federal revenue, sitting at around 1.1% on average. However, projections indicate that this could rise to 5% due to expanded tariff policies. This newfound fiscal strategy has caught the eye of many in the Republican Party, who now view tariffs as a replacement or supplement to income tax. As Washington grapples with a staggering $37 trillion national debt, interest in alternative revenue sources has surged.
Trump’s renewed focus on tariffs began in April 2025, targeting various imports from key global players, including China and the European Union. His strategy includes applying new duties across diverse industries, from textiles to electronics, and eliminating the de minimis exception, which had previously allowed small shipments to dodge full tariff enforcement. By mid-2025, he even threatened to impose tariffs as high as 30% on goods from major trading partners.
Despite the potential for increased revenue, experts caution that the identification of “found” revenue might be misleading. Shai Akabas, from the Bipartisan Policy Center, argues that rising tariff revenues are a direct consequence of government policy rather than a serendipitous surplus. He notes that the dramatic rise in tariffs could generate between $2 trillion and $3 trillion over the next decade, reshaping the federal budget landscape.
However, this revenue comes at a cost, particularly for small businesses that are often the backbone of the economy. From April to September 2025, small businesses reported average increases of $25,000 per month due to tariff obligations. For smaller firms, this burden could escalate to $86,000 monthly. Legrand Lindor, CEO of LMI Textiles, detailed how rising tariffs forced him to abandon expansion plans due to ballooning operating costs. Similarly, Jyoti Jaiswal has had to drastically change her importing strategies to manage the increased financial demands.
The impact of tariffs extends beyond dollar amounts. Small businesses are reportedly experiencing longer administrative hours due to increased paperwork associated with customs declarations, resulting from policy changes that eliminated certain exemptions. This additional burden comes at a time when job losses in the small business sector are on the rise. In November 2025, small businesses laid off 120,000 workers, the highest number since the peaks of the pandemic. Concerns over rising operating costs are prompting serious apprehension among entrepreneurs, with many indicating they may not survive the next year without relief.
Adding to the tension surrounding tariffs are legal challenges currently before the Supreme Court. The court is reviewing whether Trump exceeded his authority by implementing tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Should the court side against the former president, it might force the government to refund billions in collected tariffs, including the previously referenced $39 billion. If upheld, this could set a precedent for expanded executive powers over taxation.
As Trump continues to rally his base around the idea of shifting from income taxes to tariffs, the ramifications for American businesses and consumers remain paramount. Advocates argue that his approach punishes unfair trade practices and brings revenue back into the country. Yet the voices of small-business owners underscore a harsh reality: the very tariffs meant to generate income may lead to increased costs that could jeopardize their livelihoods. Balancing these contrasting perspectives will be crucial as the nation navigates its fiscal future.
"*" indicates required fields
