The recent operation in Venezuela raises critical concerns about the country’s military capabilities. U.S. forces infiltrated Venezuela and rapidly removed President Nicolás Maduro with astonishing efficiency—completing their mission in less than 24 hours and suffering no casualties. This operation highlights significant weaknesses in Venezuela’s armed forces, which have been hampered by aging equipment, insufficient training, and poor operational readiness despite their large personnel numbers.
The initial intention was to compare the firepower between U.S. and Venezuelan militaries. However, it quickly became evident that the disparity required a more focused analysis, ultimately pitting the Texas National Guard against the Venezuelan military. Even in this narrowed comparison, Venezuela’s forces lag significantly behind.
The Texas National Guard boasts around 22,000 to 23,000 soldiers, supported by a robust logistics and intelligence framework unique to the United States military apparatus. This integration is a crucial force multiplier that enhances effectiveness and readiness. The Guard’s substantial budget of $1.851 billion in 2023 facilitates superior training and equipment maintenance, highlighting an organizational commitment to readiness and effectiveness.
In contrast, Venezuela’s military budget is alarmingly modest, estimated between $3.9 million and $4.6 million. With a personnel count of around 115,000 in the army, complemented by 25,500 in the navy and 20,000 in the air force, Venezuela’s numbers are misleading. The militias, frequently touted by Maduro, have little training and typically pose more risk to themselves than any adversary.
Examining the equipment used by both forces reveals stark differences. The Texas National Guard utilizes modern, maintenance-backed aircraft like the F-16C/D Fighting Falcons and AH-64 Apache helicopters. This contrasts sharply with Venezuela’s air force, which suffers from extensive readiness issues. Despite possessing 24 Sukhoi Su-30MK2 fighters, many are grounded due to a lack of parts, and maintenance remains a persistent problem. The United States maintains a comprehensive edge in aviation capability, underscoring the operational limitations faced by Venezuela.
The operational outcomes during the recent U.S. mission further illustrate these weaknesses. U.S. aircraft neutralized various military installations across Venezuela, exploiting vulnerabilities in Chinese-supplied air defense systems that faltered under superior electronic warfare tactics. One analyst remarked that the strike on Fuerte Tiuna left Venezuela’s command and control effectively incapable of mounting a coherent defense.
Replacing political loyalty for military competence has distorted the Venezuelan military structure. As of 2019, Venezuela boasted a commanding officer pool of about 2,000 generals and admirals, compared to fewer than 850 in the entire U.S. military. This disproportionate rank structure emphasizes loyalty to the regime over operational experience, contributing to the military’s recent tactical failures.
Ultimately, the Texas National Guard’s integration of air and ground capabilities offers up to 85 percent of the combat potential of Venezuela’s entire military force. This analysis indicates that should an armed conflict arise on Texas soil, relying on the full spectrum of state resources—including the State Guard, Texas Rangers, and armed citizens—Venezuela would struggle to mount an effective offensive. Even with a numerical advantage, the quality of training, equipment, and overall military readiness ensures a significant tactical disadvantage for Venezuelan forces.
This military assessment starkly outlines that, in modern warfare, the extent of equipment quality, training, and operational readiness often outweighs sheer numerical advantage. Texas showcases a model of military preparedness that stands in stark contrast to the crumbling facade of Venezuela’s armed forces, reflecting the broader political and social challenges facing the nation.
"*" indicates required fields
