The Wyoming Supreme Court made a significant ruling on Tuesday, stating that certain abortion laws violate the state constitution. This includes the nation’s first explicit ban on abortion pills. In a decisive 4-1 vote, the justices upheld the arguments presented by the state’s only abortion clinic, alongside other plaintiffs who challenged the bans enacted after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
Even in a state known for its conservative values, all justices appointed by Republican governors concluded that the abortion restrictions were unconstitutional. They referenced a state constitutional amendment, passed by voters in 2012, which asserts that competent adults have the right to make their own health care decisions. The amendment was originally a response to the Affordable Care Act. While the justices noted that this amendment does not include abortion explicitly, they emphasized their duty to interpret laws without adding to them. “But lawmakers could ask Wyoming voters to consider a constitutional amendment that would more clearly address this issue,” they remarked.
Following the ruling, Wellspring Health Access President Julie Burkhart expressed relief, contending that the decision signifies that abortion is “essential health care” deserving of protection from government intrusion. “Our clinic will remain open and ready to provide compassionate reproductive health care, including abortions,” Burkhart stated. This clinic, established as the only one in Wyoming to offer surgical abortions, faced considerable adversity, including a firebombing that delayed its opening.
In contrast, the state’s attorneys argued that abortion is not recognized as health care under the state constitution. Republican Governor Mark Gordon expressed disappointment in the ruling, stressing that it does not reflect the moral views of many in Wyoming, including his own. He urged lawmakers to pursue a constitutional amendment prohibiting abortion, suggesting that such an amendment could potentially be placed before the voters in the upcoming fall election.
These developments reveal that while the legal battle may see resolution, the underlying moral and ethical debates surrounding abortion will likely persist. The state legislature, aimed at addressing critical budgetary concerns this winter, may face the challenge of introducing a controversial amendment in a predominantly Republican body. Governor Gordon’s statement reflects this tension: “This ruling may settle, for now, a legal question, but it does not settle the moral one.”
The two overturned laws included a ban on abortion with specified exceptions for life-threatening situations as well as for cases of rape or incest. The second law sought to make Wyoming the first state to outright ban abortion pills. Although similar restrictions are already imposed in other states, they typically do not define abortion medication as explicitly illegal. An earlier ruling from the Teton County District Court blocked these bans, citing their unconstitutionality.
The court’s decision underscores the ongoing struggle between state legislatures and judicial directives regarding reproductive rights. While abortion remains legal in Wyoming, the future of reproductive health policies will hinge on further legislative action and potential amendments.
"*" indicates required fields
