Investigative reporter Nick Shirley took a closer look at California’s voting system, unveiling troubling signs of potential voter fraud. In a state that does not mandate voter ID, concerns grow as elections drag on for weeks after ballots are cast. The system, populated by practices like ballot harvesting and curing, combined with widespread mail-in voting, invites scrutiny.
A startling case surfaced from Orange County, where a woman named Laura Lee Yourex, 62, was charged with a peculiar form of voting fraud—she registered her dog to vote. This bizarre incident highlights how lax regulations can lead to ridiculous outcomes, as Yourex reportedly cast mail-in ballots in her pet’s name during significant elections in 2021 and 2022. According to Todd Spitzer, Orange County’s District Attorney, the dog’s vote was counted in the 2021 recall election but was flagged and rejected in the subsequent primary election.
Shirley visited various polling locations only to discover a disturbing trend: no site could verify its voter rolls. His findings indicated discrepancies in the numbers of registered voters, such as over 30 individuals registered to the same mailbox and some voters incorrectly listed with ages such as 125 years—a striking example of the chaos within California’s voting system. “Without any voter ID and negligence from the state government to update their voter rolls,” Shirley remarked, “California’s one-party state has created a complex system where fraud is inevitable.”
This messy situation beckons deeper reflection on the implications of California’s voting practices. The state allows for open-ended voting processes which, while arguably designed to increase accessibility, can inadvertently enable manipulation. With millions voting without ID and such inconsistencies in voter registration, the credibility of California’s electoral integrity is called into question.
Adding to the growing concerns, Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, has initiated legal action against Orange County’s Registrar of Voters. This lawsuit stems from the registrar’s refusal to provide documentation that could reveal whether non-citizens were unlawfully registered and participating in federal elections.
Shirley’s investigation raises a critical alarm: as long as California maintains its current voting system, the possibilities for fraud remain alarmingly high. The public deserves an electoral framework that is both transparent and trustworthy, safeguarding the essence of democracy. With Shirley’s findings gaining attention, it becomes evident that scrutiny of California’s voting practices is not just necessary but urgent.
"*" indicates required fields
