Self-serving displays at awards shows have become all too common, and the recent Grammy Awards illustrated this perfectly. Celebrities took center stage, not just to showcase their talent but to position themselves as moral arbiters, boldly criticizing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This was less about genuine concern and more about putting on a show of righteousness. It is a phenomenon that seems to repeat itself, often devoid of real substance.
Puerto Rican rapper Bad Bunny was a central figure in this display. He proclaimed, “ICE out,” before the audience erupted with applause. “We’re not savage, we’re not animals, we’re not aliens,” he added, asserting a false equivalence that muddles legal and illegal immigration. This conflation overlooks a fundamental truth: legal immigrants enrich the nation, while illegal immigrants do not share the same standing.
Moreover, the audience’s reaction to his statements reveals a troubling trend. Rather than engage critically with his assertions, they chose to celebrate their moral superiority. The applause echoed through the venue, validating an inaccurate worldview that neglects the distinction between different types of immigrants. It was a display devoid of the critical engagement such discussions demand.
With Bad Bunny establishing the tone, singer Billie Eilish quickly followed suit, proclaiming, “No one is illegal on stolen land.” Once again, the audience cheered their approval. Eilish’s comments brushed aside the complexity of the issue. Apparently, for her and many in attendance, legality is secondary to a simplified moral narrative. Eilish expressed her hope, emphasizing the need for voices to be heard—a commendable sentiment, but undermined by the hypocrisy evident in her own circumstances. She enjoys a lavish lifestyle, remote from the struggles faced by those she seeks to advocate for, leading some, like conservative podcaster Brandon Tatum, to point out her “$3M Hollywood Hills fortress” and ask her to “hand over the keys to the nearest tribe or migrant family.”
This year, the Grammy Awards saw a plethora of stars repeating the same hollow sentiments against ICE. Observers noted nearly a dozen celebrities either donned anti-ICE pins or delivered politically charged comments. Such ostentatious activism distracts from the genuine challenges that are at play. Their contributions amount to little more than hollow gestures, lacking the substance required for real advocacy.
Ricky Gervais has previously called out this kind of virtue-signaling with biting clarity. During the 2020 Golden Globes, he advised winners not to leverage their awards as a platform for political speeches, insisting they were out of touch with everyday realities. In a recent post, he lamented that “they’re still not listening.” The persistence of this phenomenon suggests that Gervais’s words may continue to fall on deaf ears.
Ultimately, these continued displays of self-serving activism reveal a profound lack of self-awareness among the Hollywood elite. Their pursuits might fill a void in their lives, but they fail to resonate meaningfully with those outside their privileged circles. Each new cause brings a fresh opportunity for performative activism, yet deep down, it’s clear that they will never sacrifice their comfort for the beliefs they espouse. This hypocrisy elicits both contempt and pity. They paraded their moral posturing at the Grammys, but the truth remains: their actions come with zero risk to themselves.
"*" indicates required fields
